Hi, I configured he.net tunnel according to
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 and works with latest 3.7.2-4.

However I don't understand how my client is supposed get an ip6 address.
radvd is gone and I don't see anything handing out me an ip6 addr. Who's
job is it now then?

Maciej

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com>wrote:

> Saw this in dmesg too:
>
> [  720.030000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  720.030000] WARNING: at
> /build/cero2/src/Cerowrt-next/build_dir/target-mips_r2_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-ar71xx_generic/compat-wireless-2013-01-07/net/mac80211/chan.c:162
> __ieee80211_vif_release_channel+0x1d0/0x254 [mac80211]()
> [  720.050000] Modules linked in: sch_teql sch_tbf sch_sfq sch_red sch_qfq
> sch_prio sch_ns2_codel sch_nfq_codel sch_netem sch_htb sch_gred
> sch_efq_codel sch_dsmark em_text em_nbyte em_meta em_cmp cls_basic
> act_police act_ipt act_connmark act_skbedit act_mirred em_u32 cls_u32
> cls_tcindex cls_flow cls_route cls_fw sch_hfsc sch_fq_codel sch_codel
> sch_ingress usb_storage ath79_wdt ohci_hcd xt_hashlimit xt_set(O)
> ip_set_list_set(O) ip_set_hash_netport(O) ip_set_hash_netiface(O)
> ip_set_hash_net(O) ip_set_hash_ipportnet(O) ip_set_hash_ipportip(O)
> ip_set_hash_ipport(O) ip_set_hash_ip(O) ip_set_bitmap_port(O)
> ip_set_bitmap_ipmac(O) ip_set_bitmap_ip(O) ip_set(O) ip6t_REJECT ip6t_rt
> ip6t_hbh ip6t_mh ip6t_ipv6header ip6t_frag ip6t_eui64 ip6t_ah ip6table_raw
> ip6table_mangle ip6table_filter ip6_tables nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6
> nfnetlink nf_nat_irc nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_irc nf_conntrack_ftp xt_policy
> xt_esp ipt_ah xt_HL xt_hl xt_ecn ipt_ECN xt_CLASSIFY xt_time xt_tcpmss
> xt_statistic xt_mark xt_length xt_DSCP xt_dscp xt_string xt_layer7 xt_quota
> xt_pkttype xt_physdev xt_owner xt_addrtype ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat
> xt_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat xt_recent xt_helper xt_connmark xt_connbytes pptp
> pppoe xt_conntrack xt_CT iptable_raw xt_state nf_conntrack_ipv4
> nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_conntrack ehci_hcd sd_mod pppox ipt_REJECT xt_TCPMSS
> xt_LOG xt_comment xt_multiport xt_mac xt_limit iptable_mangle
> iptable_filter ip_tables xt_tcpudp x_tables ip_gre gre ifb sit ipcomp
> xfrm4_tunnel xfrm4_mode_tunnel xfrm4_mode_transport xfrm4_mode_beet esp4
> ah4 tunnel4 tun tcp_ledbat(O) ppp_async ppp_generic slhc af_key xfrm_user
> xfrm_ipcomp xfrm_algo vfat fat ext4 jbd2 mbcache autofs4 button_hotplug(O)
> ath9k(O) ath9k_common(O) ath9k_hw(O) ath(O) nls_utf8 nls_iso8859_2
> nls_iso8859_15 nls_iso8859_13 nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 mac80211(O) usbcore
> usb_common scsi_mod nls_base ts_fsm ts_bm ts_kmp crc16 crc_ccitt ipv6
> input_polldev cfg80211(O) compat(O) input_core sha1_generic md5 hmac
> des_generic deflate cbc authenc arc4 zlib_inflate zlib_deflate
> ledtrig_timer ledtrig_default_on leds_gpio gpio_button_hotplug(O)
> [  720.230000] Call Trace:
> [  720.240000] [<802a31c4>] dump_stack+0x8/0x34
> [  720.240000] [<80071e34>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xa4
> [  720.250000] [<80071e78>] warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x24
> [  720.250000] [<86d24f6c>] __ieee80211_vif_release_channel+0x1d0/0x254
> [mac80211]
> [  720.260000] [<86d253c0>] ieee80211_vif_release_channel+0x4c/0x64
> [mac80211]
> [  720.270000] [<86d14c8c>] ieee80211_stop_ap+0x194/0x1bc [mac80211]
> [  720.270000] [<86c1c50c>] cfg80211_stop_ap+0x78/0xbc [cfg80211]
> [  720.280000] [<8022c1ac>] genl_rcv_msg+0x1ec/0x234
> [  720.280000] [<8022b57c>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x6c/0xe4
> [  720.290000] [<8022bfb0>] genl_rcv+0x24/0x34
> [  720.290000] [<8022aeb0>] netlink_unicast+0x164/0x248
> [  720.300000] [<8022b334>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2c4/0x350
> [  720.300000] [<801f7064>] sock_sendmsg+0x80/0xb0
> [  720.310000] [<801f733c>] __sys_sendmsg+0x1a0/0x240
> [  720.310000] [<801f91b8>] sys_sendmsg+0x48/0x7c
> [  720.320000] [<8006a064>] stack_done+0x20/0x40
> [  720.320000]
> [  720.320000] ---[ end trace 38fe65d6c26f72f3 ]---
> Does it look like something new or already seen?
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> At least one (possibly not new) unaligned exception trap has reared its
>> head in addrconf_prefix_rcv.
>>
>> https://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/419
>>
>> This is a bad place for one! a network burp heisenbug....
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Good build! I have to report that the issue with polipo, DNS and TFO
>>> that I observed with 3.7.1-1 seems resolved.
>>> Test with and without TFO.
>>> Ketan, I won't post a bug unless it appears again.
>>>
>>
>> What I saw (Ages ago) was that dns would stop working over time in polipo.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> Maciej
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's at:
>>>>
>>>> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.7.2-3/
>>>>
>>>> It seems pretty stable but with the ipv6 churn...
>>>>
>>>> [insert my std hyperbolic warnings about exposing the release to
>>>> default gws in front of spouses or young children]
>>>>
>>>> features:
>>>>
>>>> + dnsmasq 2.66test10
>>>> + merge with openwrt head
>>>> + new unaligned access code from openwrt head (by nbd) and the
>>>> remainder of the older unaligned patch set (by robert bradley) ported
>>>> to work on top of that
>>>>
>>>> I have not checked to see if all traps are gone, you can look at that
>>>> via
>>>> files in /sys/debug/kernel/mips/
>>>>
>>>>  - it's mostly the ipv6 related traps I'm concerned about...
>>>>
>>>> The checksum routine changed and I did check checksums on a variety of
>>>> ipv4 ethernet traffic, but not enough to feel assured.
>>>>
>>>> + Bug fixed https://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/418
>>>>
>>>> BUG_ON removed on TFO support in the kernel. TFO works. I tested it by:
>>>>
>>>> echo 3 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen
>>>> editing /etc/init.d/polipo to add support for a boolean useTCPFastOpen
>>>> parameter
>>>> adding that parameter to /etc/config/polipo
>>>> testing with the current version of httping
>>>>
>>>> I will update the init script and config in the next spin.
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> The churn in how to setup ipv6 sanely continues. The configuration for
>>>> how to do it has changed significantly again and is documented at:
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6
>>>>
>>>> It's not clear to me to state of the ipv6 dnsmasq integration now.
>>>> There is much discussion on the dnsmasq-discuss list as to how to do
>>>> prefix-independent configuration as one example.
>>>>
>>>> as for the ipv6 related changes just now come down from openwrt,
>>>> steven barth tells me that:
>>>>
>>>> "6distributed functionality (prefix delegation) was merged into netifd
>>>> for size reasons.
>>>> The shell mess which was ipv6-support was abandoned.
>>>>
>>>> dhcpv6 is now a regular network proto in netifd (which can be added
>>>> ontop of other ipv4-wan types or separately for ipv6-only).
>>>>
>>>> network6 is unnecessary now. 6rd, 6to4 now automatically publish their
>>>> prefix. 6in4 adds a new option ip6prefix for adding the routed prefix.
>>>>
>>>> LANs / WLANs which want a prefix now just add a option ip6assign 64 to
>>>> the interface definition.
>>>>
>>>> See examples in: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6
>>>>
>>>> Prefix Announcement / DHCPv6 / Relaying has been untangled and should
>>>> be moved into the respective daemon config / init. I've done this for
>>>> 6relayd.
>>>>
>>>> For dnsmasq you will have to add config support similar to what is
>>>> done for DHCP in IPv4, so it should be easy to adapt. Maybe some of
>>>> the CeroWrt contributors like to add that.
>>>>
>>>> I also haven't looked at NPT yet. I've removed the shell-script mess
>>>> for now as we will not have all targets up to 3.7 in the coming weeks
>>>> and therefore also not a new ip6tables."
>>>>
>>>> AHCP is still lost and lonely in the configuration.
>>>>
>>>> I took a stab at enabling ipv6 NPT support myself in this release, but
>>>> the changes I'd made to the openwrt configuration didn't successfully
>>>> get the modules to compile nor create a package. My *non-working
>>>> patch* looked like this, and suggestions as to what sort of magic wand
>>>> to wave over it welcomed.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/netfilter.mk b/include/netfilter.mk
>>>> index 1d89e6d..3d65f76 100644
>>>> --- a/include/netfilter.mk
>>>> +++ b/include/netfilter.mk
>>>> @@ -154,10 +154,14 @@ $(eval $(call
>>>> nf_add,IPT_IPV6,CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_RT, $(P_V6)ip6t_rt))
>>>>
>>>>  $(eval $(call nf_add,IPT_IPV6,CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_LOG,
>>>> $(P_V6)ip6t_LOG))
>>>>  $(eval $(call nf_add,IPT_IPV6,CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_REJECT,
>>>> $(P_V6)ip6t_REJECT))
>>>> +$(eval $(call nf_add,IPT_IPV6,CONFIG_IP6_NF_NAT, $(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6))
>>>> +$(eval $(call nf_add,IPT_IPV6,CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_MASQUERADE,
>>>> $(P_V6)ip6t_MASQUERADE))
>>>> +$(eval $(call nf_add,IPT_IPv6,CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_NPT,
>>>> $(P_V6)ip6t_NPT))
>>>>
>>>>  # nat
>>>>
>>>>  # kernel only
>>>> +$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT6,CONFIG_IP6_NF_NAT,
>>>> $(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6, ge 3.7.0),))
>>>>  $(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT,
>>>> $(P_XT)nf_nat $(P_V4)nf_nat_ipv4 $(P_XT)xt_nat $(P_V4)iptable_nat, ge
>>>> 3.7.0),))
>>>>  $(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT,
>>>> $(P_V4)nf_nat $(P_V4)iptable_nat, lt 3.7.0),))
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/package/kernel/modules/netfilter.mk
>>>> b/package/kernel/modules/netfilter.mk
>>>> index 69bdba0..d862c32 100644
>>>> --- a/package/kernel/modules/netfilter.mk
>>>> +++ b/package/kernel/modules/netfilter.mk
>>>> @@ -164,6 +164,23 @@ endef
>>>>
>>>>  $(eval $(call KernelPackage,ipt-nat))
>>>>
>>>> +define KernelPackage/ipt-nat6
>>>> +  TITLE:=Basic NAT targets for IPv6
>>>> +  KCONFIG:=$(KCONFIG_IPT_NAT6)
>>>> +  FILES:=$(foreach mod,$(IPT_NAT6-m),$(LINUX_DIR)/net/$(mod).ko)
>>>> +  AUTOLOAD:=$(call AutoLoad,42,$(notdir $(IPT_NAT6-m)))
>>>> +  $(call AddDepends/ipt)
>>>> +endef
>>>> +
>>>> +define KernelPackage/ipt-nat6/description
>>>> + Netfilter (IPv6) kernel modules for basic NAT targets
>>>> + Includes:
>>>> + - MASQUERADE
>>>> + - NPT
>>>> +endef
>>>> +
>>>> +$(eval $(call KernelPackage,ipt-nat6))
>>>> +
>>>>
>>>>  define KernelPackage/ipt-nat-extra
>>>>    TITLE:=Extra NAT targets
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Täht
>>>>
>>>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
>>>> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>>
>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
>> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>>
>
>