From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (mail-qa0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FDE20175A for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w5so3808459qac.3 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:28:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OdDPBr2L+Tu9B9LgQOMXi9hq0vDfVUIAgLHYEPy+aKg=; b=QvZO6SOmVG7RrVYVbHuOFRCYkF2srp10y8OS9wt6mqym/7n06NOL9ywFersDwOsvkq JbEgXzZFNd+hm+5N5CQRbbiwcvRzMdlrkxIeRp3nDlvliZg0LDtolVzLh8PIFMZr0zzs ao7XhfqY3BG+TWpnkKNf91vdnMTGasEIlhsjvTLUNIWd+MxrJ+j91FXqUh6CQaga1mSe cJ96ui3i/EEVhE+idxKM2szCz1aNN/SuLoWaTWwA2ra2qRN7Rz7azRy1U6XrBdqoaGSA PeL3NQOsjd29n29GszY+QOtnxjNXAzuRKe+dNBVzU8S3CslKCVlB1so5IUHggyWpFYNl cLxg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmJH5q9TWHdkuFfDiAnUnqB/K/LK7+LajeHc76MYw68AzkqdfGoXCGoRDunFcStkrNPb2g MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.66.134 with SMTP id n6mr19738751qai.39.1390566513206; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:28:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.132.3 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:28:33 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [85.221.151.252] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:28:33 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: Aaron Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] a new chipset and elsewhere a review of streamboost X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:28:34 -0000 Couldn't find a mention of *codel, but it would be sad to see vendors just sprinkle some traffic shaping on top of codel and brand it. It cheers me up that *codel is about to be picked up by the vendors, but not when customers are tricked to pay extra for SuperBoostNow [tm] or DoMeQuick [tm]... -- Maciej On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Aaron Wood wrote: > It would be interesting to see what streamboost gains on top of just > fq_codel. Since it appears that they are doing so fairly heavy-handed > traffic shaping. > > -Aaron > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> An interesting new chipset: >> >> >> http://www.anandtech.com/show/7526/qualcomm-atheros-announces-new-intern= et-processor-lineup-ipq8064-and-ipq8062 >> >> And streamboost (of which fq_codel is a component) is getting good >> reviews: >> >> >> http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/lanwan-features/32297-does-qualcom= ms-streamboost-really-work?start=3D1 >> >> -- >> Dave T=C3=A4ht >> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: >> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >