On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> I have been collecting statistics on the behavior of the 3.7.5-2 version >> of cerowrt, and perhaps y'all out there can help. I've been doing four >> repeatable tests. >> >> I feed the attached file into the chrome web page benchmark and run it 4 >> times: >> >> 1) No other load on the system >> 2) while running a single up and single down netperf stream to icei.org(on the east coast) >> 3) then while still loaded, after turning on simple_qos.sh, set for ~85% >> of the rated up/down bandwidth... >> 4) then killing the load, and keeping simple_qos enabled. >> > Is that good if I run the chrome benchmark from a win7 laptop on 802.11n > wifi, while netperfs are going from the wndr3800? > Forgot to mention my win7 TCP setup is: netsh interface>tcp show global Querying active state... TCP Global Parameters ---------------------------------------------- Receive-Side Scaling State : enabled Chimney Offload State : automatic NetDMA State : enabled Direct Cache Acess (DCA) : disabled Receive Window Auto-Tuning Level : normal Add-On Congestion Control Provider : none ECN Capability : enabled RFC 1323 Timestamps : disabled Regards, Maciej