From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com (mail-oa0-f43.google.com [209.85.219.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C1FF21F194 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l10so3763181oag.30 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:40:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=hwCIqpnSE9KBBcSYrP8luWOCLnIzYtPvAVCECiAOIoQ=; b=iC4BLBnVbnQNJEm4PSmyMCMvUTq0h0rkey0ed6+PQzrLGoSAe7LMWAT6p/H9U7+7q/ zLJI+Kz9qy6IKN23RVHTbi6mSJv96OmhttlKJEbZZO+se6Y/OpVUoE9WwslItqkYOzPl AiGJg4d3GxObUfzJn61r7AIaPB4YylvTT7wc/QXBJaCbOCBPO9TYsZhu0ifG/d5B/zHh syz9q2JkoBO5uPTFp97SgDGn2oCTtcDxBuweWCoxtcqjtumHPL9NRa/Kw6gbFOhJrm2d v9KBfwHnhyqtep2hHvC8CBDyJe3bl9AzV2JQEuKXkf9IlE8KLhvnFImeuSfuxd2H6Whb 7T6w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.14.39 with SMTP id m7mr8932762obc.96.1361824854013; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.20.139 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:40:53 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [77.65.47.165] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:40:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9399ad1abe71b04d6928e02 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJTNg/oGrEzyD7t4/4YzkSGUnmeaXwkJrzcKB6OerLvFp7HvpQOr/0ldwDoJx2y3NUX1Hv Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] collecting some data? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:40:55 -0000 --14dae9399ad1abe71b04d6928e02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> I have been collecting statistics on the behavior of the 3.7.5-2 version >> of cerowrt, and perhaps y'all out there can help. I've been doing four >> repeatable tests. >> >> I feed the attached file into the chrome web page benchmark and run it 4 >> times: >> >> 1) No other load on the system >> 2) while running a single up and single down netperf stream to icei.org(on the east coast) >> 3) then while still loaded, after turning on simple_qos.sh, set for ~85% >> of the rated up/down bandwidth... >> 4) then killing the load, and keeping simple_qos enabled. >> > Is that good if I run the chrome benchmark from a win7 laptop on 802.11n > wifi, while netperfs are going from the wndr3800? > Forgot to mention my win7 TCP setup is: netsh interface>tcp show global Querying active state... TCP Global Parameters ---------------------------------------------- Receive-Side Scaling State : enabled Chimney Offload State : automatic NetDMA State : enabled Direct Cache Acess (DCA) : disabled Receive Window Auto-Tuning Level : normal Add-On Congestion Control Provider : none ECN Capability : enabled RFC 1323 Timestamps : disabled Regards, Maciej --14dae9399ad1abe71b04d6928e02 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com= > wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dave Taht <dave.= taht@gmail.com> wrote:
I have been collecting statistics on the behavior of the 3.7.5-2 versi= on of cerowrt, and perhaps y'all out there can help. I've been doin= g four repeatable tests.

I feed the attached file into = the chrome web page benchmark and run it 4 times:

1) No other load on the system
2) while running a = single up and single down netperf stream to icei.org (on the east coast)
3) then while sti= ll loaded, after turning on simple_qos.sh, set for ~85% of the rated up/dow= n bandwidth...
4) then killing the load, and keeping simple_qos enabled.
Is that good if I run the chrome benchmark from a win7 lap= top on 802.11n wifi, while netperfs are going from the wndr3800?
Forgot to mention my win7 TCP setup is:
=
netsh interface>tcp show global
Querying active state...<= /div>

TCP Global Parameters
------------------= ----------------------------
Receive-Side Scaling State =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: enabled=
Chimney Offload State =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 : automatic
NetDMA State =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: enabled
Dir= ect Cache Acess (DCA) =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: disabled
Receive Window Auto-Tuning Level =C2=A0 =C2=A0: normal
Add-O= n Congestion Control Provider =C2=A0: none
ECN Capability =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: enab= led
RFC 1323 Timestamps =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : disabled=C2=A0

Regards,
Maciej
--14dae9399ad1abe71b04d6928e02--