Funny thing. Latest dropbear still has these 2 commented out for some reason. Maybe it's worth checking upstream. Maciej On 25 Oct 2014 15:36, "Dave Taht" wrote: > I'd argue more in favor of updating to the latest dropbear, pulled anyway. > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Maciej Soltysiak > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Michael Richardson > wrote: > >> > >> Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > >> >> The reason why it hurts me is that I have servers configured > >> >> according to bettercrypto.org and I can't connect from cero > (rare > >> >> occasions, but > >> >> > >> >> 1) MD5 != HMAC-MD5. > >> > That I didn't know, thanks Michael. For some reason > bettercrypto.org > >> > >> Yeah, people get very excited over pattern matching of crypto > algorithms. > > Well, that may be the case. Here though, I'm more interested in > introducing > > HMAC-SHA2s, than eradicating HMAC-MD5 as my setups wouldn't allow it > anyway. > > > > Anyway, Dave, here's the pull request: > > https://github.com/dtaht/cerowrt-3.10/pull/1 > > And here's the commit I'm suggesting: > > > https://github.com/pysiak/cerowrt-3.10/commit/3cac2227700561272e3476f568318c42975bc813 > > > > The request is to patch a patch unfortunately :-) > > > > Can you have a look, please? > > Maciej Soltysiak > > _______________________________________________ > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks >