On 25 Oct 2014 15:36, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

I'd argue more in favor of updating to the latest dropbear, pulled anyway.

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com> wrote:
>>     >> The reason why it hurts me is that I have servers configured
>>     >> according to bettercrypto.org and I can't connect from cero (rare
>>     >> occasions, but
>>     >>
>>     >> 1) MD5 != HMAC-MD5.
>>     > That I didn't know, thanks Michael. For some reason bettercrypto.org
>>
>> Yeah, people get very excited over pattern matching of crypto algorithms.
> Well, that may be the case. Here though, I'm more interested in introducing
> HMAC-SHA2s, than eradicating HMAC-MD5 as my setups wouldn't allow it anyway.
>
> Anyway, Dave, here's the pull request:
> https://github.com/dtaht/cerowrt-3.10/pull/1
> And here's the commit I'm suggesting:
> https://github.com/pysiak/cerowrt-3.10/commit/3cac2227700561272e3476f568318c42975bc813
>
> The request is to patch a patch unfortunately :-)
>
> Can you have a look, please?
> Maciej Soltysiak
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



--
Dave Täht

thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks