From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52BCF200BEB for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so19415555obq.16 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:51:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=MPQxufCzzvfc0v5fxG3NhCckzoaCebDCvFVltJ3d/nQ=; b=ZQaUPb5nRYPjvBunGkvkkwgcKn0bUrIpJUXUnptRQ0RCGep3NFOW9XdQb39d7jMVgT l2F3nQpthoAhY/e4tjunuJFf3ti/tPHd79zL3BRBtkAUsmtE8E/ZQf6gS/ZK2fMY1Y/g 91TgEz2X1ccTVJawXViw88NIrnB4EaOxQmvaQif2DU3+ZjcsDxggHmX+MNlxKE9rS8+G KkbfikTr7oGfuz7HUif7FKO7/WGYp0B2zy7KKpdvosovF2QTMjGLZuSezxXSAX+Kk1iJ kzuGN3ilXuH2MoXjgeuWXD+fp1uNwLH6zNNVt7vTieIPQkQGxIcXZWy67w+NqH4IicxJ QptA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.237.71 with SMTP id va7mr3680429igc.6.1342374702078; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.31.106 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:51:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [77.65.42.82] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:51:42 +0200 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447a24345dc6f04c4e1f73a X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkoOqGDe64pATQ1FLgvv0dwWlc2AjQ8fb7Hp/c5Fu+YZCjimIs2A3Mo7iiNZp8kQSlf3yWA Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Different BIND setup per interface X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:51:43 -0000 --f46d0447a24345dc6f04c4e1f73a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Looks like using a view, match-clients and forward should work. Will try and see. On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am thinking of having clients on my -guest intefaces to resolve DNS not > from root, but from OpenDNS. > This is to have the guests (which may be neighbors, neighbor's kids, > visitors) to be able to use DNS that has some filtering ON: scam, malware, > etc. > > I am OK to use normal DNS internally. > > Any thoughts on doing that? I know the Tomato build for WRT54GL allowed > entering credentials for opendns and that worked. > > Regards, > Maciej > > --f46d0447a24345dc6f04c4e1f73a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looks like using a view, match-clients and forward should work. Will try an= d see.

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:07 PM, M= aciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com> wrote:
Hi guys,

I am thinking of having clie= nts on my -guest intefaces to resolve DNS not from root, but from OpenDNS.<= br> This is to have the guests (which may be neighbors, neighbor's kids, vi= sitors) to be able to use DNS that has some filtering ON: scam, malware, et= c.

I am OK to use normal DNS internally.

Any thoughts on doing that= ? I know the Tomato build for WRT54GL allowed entering credentials for open= dns and that worked.

Regards,
Maciej


--f46d0447a24345dc6f04c4e1f73a--