From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f43.google.com (mail-qe0-f43.google.com [209.85.128.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98F4321F0B3 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id nc12so4922458qeb.16 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 05:22:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sWrSbZi4rpRG9GpXddb6JcytMqVsHl2wo+rap8cGtEk=; b=YvlebTgKc/SNY8+eV7S6fhd0TbHj9wypbhJZhRyHuQ+FX40DZ02Yosb3C2lXKPxZ0x jNShph1nUBopLIC1GLsEatJGODW5V0uJgtOZkrSGicpNXc2yeSLGfmOuY3XE9lmFXm0f fToXL1bg4pSuHBQ7yDpbLQtYYJhTKo38rT8VXZIxXnF7TCMP/nGHq5SMaBVDGWJwMFUA ygdSoaz5UJ6VMq3AJdkCkymtI1B495GtkUl2BQpyxOkES/pzdOT/oZmms9RLIBGS0tet cuaf22o+XHFDERik5x3th0AtJL/10n1qaWjCG3KGJVWs+gJKe0SZYesLoWW9HsJ3DJOh aoSA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnuWQZHsjyxhi3fEUdi6CwV3mItj0MLCauBG7EUx15vSJza8lfM/ra/uk2qHeQMIxqR5Brx MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.35.15 with SMTP id d15mr28989652qej.16.1383657765584; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 05:22:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.52.98 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:22:45 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [198.28.69.5] Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:22:45 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] TSO sizing and FQ scheduler X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:22:48 -0000 Hi list, 3.12 landed with TSO sizing and FQ scheduler. Is there significant benefit of trying to port these to Cero's 3.10 ? I'm assuming we're not going head on to 3.12 for kernel base for cero as of yet? Best regards, Maciej