From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com (mail-oa0-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FC8821F1A0 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k14so5948791oag.11 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:24:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=RoQmfX1g7PuJjGpd68VJsBIQIQokqcSad4c65TMPb0s=; b=gfng+6JrYtkAnSNr7teoDaD/4eZWskPGAhpNdChsxte5H+ZDhZN/2nwtcvHoDBYAL1 KFNdHqzD7sKp/dlI4u9pE2MgJAdkJYQarpfRIDLhp9aq8DEhZDTUVIUeGSW23eQRP66N PAY3I8m1WTF1nK+cI/ToeuAowkM3Y7cgFaYWPiWszHGZtIHwp+fb1oGHxTPSGk8QE59V 93SOSI99uCY2yOk9t988RQYDe6fHF2ZUvtrLw6IYSoplAwSKxK6V8H/5MJf7ADwwU59z fD0DaaoZcLnDO4ImCXi63g278UXtBgUaguyVeZwqxns6KzMzVpsUE1Qe4M853M24bVo9 mIyg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.54.103 with SMTP id i7mr13420892obp.62.1359915846307; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:24:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.80.99 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:24:06 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [77.65.47.165] In-Reply-To: References: <2450269.5e6MBhORZ9@markc> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:24:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maciej Soltysiak To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93a113df1900f04d4d614f7 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmLBSPx703yKP5jpSOJf8AUpkaXmrW+yJttnQIi5T3+mMXPGGS5ukxGRvgd+vdKC8WAvcqi Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford talk/deluged in hardware/yurtlab X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:24:07 -0000 --14dae93a113df1900f04d4d614f7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark Constable wrote: > >> On 2013-02-03 09:18am, Dave Taht wrote: >> > I'm grumpy, as it doesn't have an esata interface internally, >> apparently. >> >> https://www.google.com?q=HP+N40L+MicroServer >> >> I know this is no where near an embedded device but I just got one of >> these >> on sale (new model out) for $220 and I think it's the most useful >> all-round >> cheap server box I've ever seen. Some people have it running 16 GB ram and >> I've got mine booting off an SSD via external eSATA. Very well built with >> 2 >> x half height PCI slots (4 x eth port card?). Only missing USB3 ports and >> hot-swap drive space. And, very quiet with just an SSD. >> > > I'd be very interested to know how fast it could do packet header captures. > > Line rate (gigE) would be good. > > Does it do BQL? (what is the onboard ethernet chips) > http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06b/15351-15351-4237916-4237918-4237917-4248009-5153252-5153253.html?dnr=1 says: HP NC107i Integrated PCI Express Gigabit Server Adapter --14dae93a113df1900f04d4d614f7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Dave Taht <da= ve.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark Constable <markc@renta.net> wrote:
On 2013-02-03 09:18am, Dave Taht wrote:
> I'm grumpy, as it doesn't have an esata interface internally, = apparently.

https://www.google.com?q=3DHP+N40L+MicroServer

I know this is no where near an embedded device but I just got one of these=
on sale (new model out) for $220 and I think it's the most useful all-r= ound
cheap server box I've ever seen. Some people have it running 16 GB ram = and
I've got mine booting off an SSD via external eSATA. Very well built wi= th 2
x half height PCI slots (4 x eth port card?). Only missing USB3 ports and hot-swap drive space. And, very quiet with just an SSD.

I'd be very interested to know how fast it could do packet = header captures.

Line rate (gigE) would be good.

Does it do = BQL? (what is the onboard ethernet chips)
--14dae93a113df1900f04d4d614f7--