From: Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [aqm] the side effects of 330ms lag in the real world
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:43:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMcKhMSnsRV4PYNjFJYQvCLJbMML3L8HDY-3mRbiuTDruYjVHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404290907240.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se>
On 29 April 2014 09:08, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> Also, what access method has 300 ms access latency, let alone 3 seconds?
> None that I know of, the meaningful comparison would be ADSL2+ at around
> 25ms and 3G at around 50-100ms.
Latencies on my ADSL2+ connection in Johannesburg, South Africa to my
ISP, a host in the UK, and a host in the USA:
--- www.mweb.co.za ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.720/38.594/66.841/9.507 ms
--- anor.aduial.net ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9010ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 197.966/201.981/211.580/4.619 ms
--- speedtest.atlanta.linode.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 285.859/292.451/331.214/13.285 ms
And of course, I have bufferbloat mitigation in play.
--
mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-29 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-29 1:24 [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2014-04-29 7:08 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] " Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-04-29 7:21 ` Fred Baker (fred)
2014-04-29 7:56 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-04-29 15:46 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-29 16:51 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Aaron Wood
2014-04-29 16:44 ` Jim Gettys
2014-04-29 16:57 ` Jim Gettys
2014-04-29 17:01 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] [Bloat] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-04-29 17:07 ` Jim Gettys
2014-04-29 18:09 ` Greg White
2014-04-30 3:21 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-29 17:02 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-30 6:16 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [aqm] " Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-04-29 7:43 ` Tristan Seligmann [this message]
2014-04-29 23:01 Hal Murray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMcKhMSnsRV4PYNjFJYQvCLJbMML3L8HDY-3mRbiuTDruYjVHg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mithrandi@mithrandi.net \
--cc=aqm@ietf.org \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox