Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.34-1 dev build released

[David Personette <dperson@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1852 bytes --]

I've got about 20 hours of uptime now, no issues to report.

-- 
David P.



On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> + Resync with openwrt
> + update to linux-3.10.34-1
> - untested (and I don't have time to test this weekend)
>
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.34-1/
>
> I regard the first build in a new kernel series as possibly really
> unstable.
>
> So if you are happy with 3.10.32-12, stay there and let someone else
> take their lumps with this.
>
> There were some fixes for wifi that went into .34 that seem trivial but
> might be important, notably the one for WPA.
>
> BTW, I tend to read these religiously when they come out (usually
> via an announcement on lwn.net.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.34
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.33
>
> (also in terms of religion my wednesday evenings are spent with lwn.net)
>
> I have to admit that I enjoyed reading commit:
> 5a0b9c33b0a361a7b82fc4ae509bfc1df004f2c0
>
> But I note:
>
> I'd rather like to outsource tracking new 3.10 kernel versions to someone
> else, to act as a "spotter" - 'oh, that bug looks important to get
> fixed in cerowrt.'
>
> In fact, if there is anyone out there crazy enough to read 3.14
> commits or lkml or netdev or linux-wireless on a regular basis, speak
> up....
>
> I long ago gave up on lkml, basically sort for a very few people on
> netdev, and haven't been paying much attention to 3.13+.
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3018 bytes --]