I've got about 20 hours of uptime now, no issues to report. -- David P. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > + Resync with openwrt > + update to linux-3.10.34-1 > - untested (and I don't have time to test this weekend) > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.34-1/ > > I regard the first build in a new kernel series as possibly really > unstable. > > So if you are happy with 3.10.32-12, stay there and let someone else > take their lumps with this. > > There were some fixes for wifi that went into .34 that seem trivial but > might be important, notably the one for WPA. > > BTW, I tend to read these religiously when they come out (usually > via an announcement on lwn.net. > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.34 > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.33 > > (also in terms of religion my wednesday evenings are spent with lwn.net) > > I have to admit that I enjoyed reading commit: > 5a0b9c33b0a361a7b82fc4ae509bfc1df004f2c0 > > But I note: > > I'd rather like to outsource tracking new 3.10 kernel versions to someone > else, to act as a "spotter" - 'oh, that bug looks important to get > fixed in cerowrt.' > > In fact, if there is anyone out there crazy enough to read 3.14 > commits or lkml or netdev or linux-wireless on a regular basis, speak > up.... > > I long ago gave up on lkml, basically sort for a very few people on > netdev, and haven't been paying much attention to 3.13+. > > > -- > Dave Täht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >