From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB55421F1BD for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:25:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id va2so1667710obc.5 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:25:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=znbnW/+UJRl1/ROd+pNbEiQJ1RWIUgS4FydZzVqK38E=; b=sJYkusLNCgNwSk8vXU3KwHQ69snBg5YUL6ZSFl8AcjX1Sdhm2dkjCxGJTR/hdB00Rn e35aAcciHc4LBc+EERwsZoOQIHLoEGZYwtTh3vG88J7ovRlMqDXhA70n6jriwUEl30by TUaiKrsQ1TVHH077l4ZZKdUm7MVe/yMXIBRpruLDr/5mheXLIdNXy4sU8TA9XrgtJEpk LyP4iVHa8VDUvve5Lc6RNVFqzDgf47/AvV5Rd1dHYgB5yKfhg+i9AryQcJUb24b9tlfz s8TbT4HHQOtmq6BXH+h8CbUm8LJ+aNuysLDQvvTIbi2MgcoFdqgx3RS8A19CJouUocNp VzNA== X-Received: by 10.60.58.134 with SMTP id r6mr3348864oeq.17.1389291921496; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:25:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.38.194 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:25:01 -0800 (PST) From: David Personette Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:25:01 -0500 Message-ID: To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c71e478619b04ef8dbb69 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] ADSL2+ modem X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 18:25:25 -0000 --089e013c71e478619b04ef8dbb69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I've seen reference on the mailing list to a DSL modem that had a patched FW to reduce it's over buffering (but not the actual manufacturer and model). I was going to get a modem soon, and thought that it would be good to support a more open platform where I can. Did anyone on the list know the details (including where to get the updated FW)? Thanks in advance. -- David P. --089e013c71e478619b04ef8dbb69 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've seen reference on the mailing list to a DSL modem= that had a patched FW to reduce it's over buffering (but not the actua= l manufacturer and model). I was going to get a modem soon, and thought tha= t it would be good to support a more open platform where I can. Did anyone = on the list know the details (including where to get the updated FW)? Thank= s in advance.

--
David P.
--089e013c71e478619b04ef8dbb69--