From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B728221F1B6 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 03:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n12so5843486wgh.23 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 03:03:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=tCqw6IWx3841XSvhrC3dhWso3LR4pS0uIihaZg5NWDM=; b=mNeVnexKCsy+ho4bRuTd+kvYjyo6fZGRZYy5xjf6EQcRt8uO1xgVqFOUpiwl4ydC0b w0uoawffLDr8EF4X5+03ofdk29cfdchCyW+Zc87JG12lCZ/Hr4Yd+IcPB76h+sdRE3U0 XeiKmx6zcPwCBhGO7vqWCHFE0K4EO7ljvtyu6WYVxS8BkNA024C4gzlhxug1+zBDHIXQ Nr2KLbKwmslLJ5FZU0V0pBGUh8n/1r8D8QBS5idZXGCLFLXDKUwJ+YY3h/p3yrAR5xgQ 3PYAciTXk1xyzBuoGEaCtHg35MoQVfr8FUff2DPgcw0GLq/0ZEhSMjfKj/cFukd4acYH 45UQ== X-Received: by 10.194.242.200 with SMTP id ws8mr663611wjc.60.1381745038332; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 03:03:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.92.70 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 03:03:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: David Personette Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 06:03:38 -0400 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d1eaa2e197e04e8b096e2 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.15-5 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:04:01 -0000 --089e013d1eaa2e197e04e8b096e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You are correct cerowrt / dnsmasq are still behaving exactly the same on 3.10.15-5. --=20 David P. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > totally untested. I will be back in front of a router in the yurtlab > monday morning PDT. > > + resync with openwrt > - revert back to dnsmasq 2.66 (openwrt head) > > Judging from the conversation it sounds like the dnsmasq bug may well > not be the latest dnsmasq at all! but a modern openwrt not interacting > with the multiple devices correctly. So I've reverted dnsmasq to > openwrt head to test that assumption... > > ... in the morning. Unless someone beats me to it. > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.15-5/ > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --089e013d1eaa2e197e04e8b096e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You are correct cerowrt / dnsmasq are still behaving exact= ly the same on 3.10.15-5.

--
David P.


On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Dave Ta= ht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
totally untested. I will be back in front of a router in the yurtlab
monday morning =C2=A0PDT.

+ resync with openwrt
- revert back to dnsmasq 2.66 (openwrt head)

Judging from the conversation it sounds like the dnsmasq bug may well
not be the latest dnsmasq at all! but a modern openwrt not interacting
with the multiple devices correctly. So I've reverted dnsmasq to
openwrt head to test that assumption...

... in the morning. Unless someone beats me to it.

http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3= .10.15-5/

--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscrib= e.html
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

--089e013d1eaa2e197e04e8b096e2--