Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release

[David Personette <dperson@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2976 bytes --]

It's been running fine for me this morning. I didn't experience the odhcp6d
issue personally (21 day uptime on 3.10.18-1). Thanks.

-- 
David P.


On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> As best as I recall it was needed for ext4 and btrfs support on
> mounting external devices, but that was years ago.
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> >
> > On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for
> >> dnsmasq. It is completely untested.
> >>
> >> + fresh merge with openwrt
> >> ++ bunch of ath9k fixes
> >> + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs)
> >>
> >> - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436
> >>   plan to update the machine involved to this version.
> >>   hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someone
> >>   with comcast ipv6 to try this on....
> >>
> >> - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried it
> >>   will do so shortly
> >
> >         The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before
> running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the
> incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in its
> already installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the upgrade.
> I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try the next
> time :)
> >         BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place,
> or what is the busy box mount command missing?
> >
> > best regards
> >         sebastian
> >
> >>
> >> - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack
> >>  in openwrt in general, but no details.
> >>
> >> I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work
> >> on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through
> >> their paces...  It seemes likely I will do another build between now
> >> and thursday.
> >>
> >> In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep
> >> digesting your turkey.
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_8U4j51lI
> >>
> >> New version of pie should get dropped next week.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dave Täht
> >>
> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4477 bytes --]