From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-x235.google.com (mail-oa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4BF321F17D for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:46:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m1so13447917oag.12 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:46:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=qPwOaKw9lMwD1NrYZXi9Y7pJNEkcyJkmxN8X3f93qJs=; b=gvqIC9QL9oiDksSyJVFJoKERdjQkflpX5RH+k+3RRodfsEJvmg9oESBIQY+Bf4KCzA pnglEN6no/5/jW5+QI0axNEZNHjyb98/EM1c5TTarirRw1m3MCOGTI2/lrvo1/eajn2s PpJ9iK1aF/9aIWmT4dOmGqOKb8IdZjcIR1By7JYY5CT1oHyV9sNXJJaoA5LUtgjEjCqx mMaK4HeDa2jzqnz29KippOLvkp4MpZB8U8irbiA9Mg0aVNd7uxnWyv6gwhM+DHJ/dIMx iLOTviM5P/lSSqkwlxCZsGJ7CqcxTl/UkbZO3jsP003x9hfYmGUEB77pVnEX4dDx6p87 XZYw== X-Received: by 10.182.229.34 with SMTP id sn2mr32021obc.86.1385999181804; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:46:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.38.194 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:46:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: David Personette Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 10:46:01 -0500 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11349750e3fd0e04ec8f146c Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:46:23 -0000 --001a11349750e3fd0e04ec8f146c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's been running fine for me this morning. I didn't experience the odhcp6d issue personally (21 day uptime on 3.10.18-1). Thanks. --=20 David P. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > As best as I recall it was needed for ext4 and btrfs support on > mounting external devices, but that was years ago. > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote= : > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht wrote: > > > >> This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for > >> dnsmasq. It is completely untested. > >> > >> + fresh merge with openwrt > >> ++ bunch of ath9k fixes > >> + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs) > >> > >> - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436 > >> plan to update the machine involved to this version. > >> hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someon= e > >> with comcast ipv6 to try this on.... > >> > >> - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried = it > >> will do so shortly > > > > The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before > running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the > incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in i= ts > already installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the upgrad= e. > I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try the next > time :) > > BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place, > or what is the busy box mount command missing? > > > > best regards > > sebastian > > > >> > >> - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack > >> in openwrt in general, but no details. > >> > >> I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work > >> on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through > >> their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now > >> and thursday. > >> > >> In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep > >> digesting your turkey. > >> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DW5_8U4j51lI > >> > >> New version of pie should get dropped next week. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dave T=C3=A4ht > >> > >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list > >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --001a11349750e3fd0e04ec8f146c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It's been running fine for me this morning. I didn'= ;t experience the odhcp6d issue personally (21 day uptime on 3.10.18-1). Th= anks.

--
David P.<= /div>

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Dave Ta= ht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
As best as I recall it was needed for ext4 and btrfs support on
mounting external devices, but that was years ago.

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
> On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for >> dnsmasq. It is completely untested.
>>
>> + fresh merge with openwrt
>> ++ bunch of ath9k fixes
>> + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs)
>>
>> - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436=
>> =C2=A0 plan to update the machine involved to this version.
>> =C2=A0 hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to fi= nd someone
>> =C2=A0 with comcast ipv6 to try this on....
>>
>> - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven'= t tried it
>> =C2=A0 will do so shortly
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 The quickest test should be to deinstall m= ount-utils before running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the = source of the incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automaticall= y bring in its already installed mount-utils, so everything should work aft= er the upgrade. I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'= ;ll try the next time :)
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 BTW, what is the reason we need mount-util= s in the first place, or what is the busy box mount command missing?
>
> best regards
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 sebastian
>
>>
>> - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" = crash attack
>> =C2=A0in openwrt in general, but no details.
>>
>> I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope = to work
>> on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes thro= ugh
>> their paces... =C2=A0It seemes likely I will do another build betw= een now
>> and thursday.
>>
>> In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to ke= ep
>> digesting your turkey.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DW5_8U4j51lI
>>
>> New version of pie should get dropped next week.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave T=C3=A4ht
>>
>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt= /subscribe.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-dev= el@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscrib= e.html
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

--001a11349750e3fd0e04ec8f146c--