From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yk0-x232.google.com (mail-yk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDEEE21F29E for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 18:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 79so2370881ykr.9 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 18:26:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=iCyltYpgXel4Y51hkBB6k6vlwArxduVZ6CPVF2RihkI=; b=avgI2b1yxtoBuUQe15OusR0pkNfiXRZWJvETKmgfgvocwNnvFn0dLHFl+Y1Fwe6h7E cVRAvc4xv3NhxMdnfJ6QgMhUBXAaFN3wxLJ6nEyg4REK3rOl8/8WoW7Yd13tEGbBB/OK RVRkKrZcB/va4ZAGYa9iskMiE52DKfYd7DRQwYBU3+M7BAP3sDR7zt6tof1SkEeQ/RC6 sSVl516wKE4diSMqAarI+IrF3Zmw2gldhnvPiZ5ZDdYqBDVQkoMF4K5BZKl03Vn3GQx7 XUvLVfa8r/KuikofX8fyfkRZbnABdQH1mn9Fq9Km+oLQk6yFtAnZgX2/fPUHvGkZRnxn tWWw== X-Received: by 10.236.137.8 with SMTP id x8mr12566316yhi.4.1396574801870; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 18:26:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.71.133 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 18:26:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <533DA665.2050305@gmail.com> From: David Personette Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 21:26:21 -0400 Message-ID: To: Maxim Kharlamov Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b397dce33f7e26a04f62d68eb Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.34-4 dev build released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 01:26:43 -0000 --485b397dce33f7e26a04f62d68eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have an OSX laptop on 5ghz, a Linux desktop and server via ethernet, Linux Laptop via 5gz, Roku via 5gz, Nexus 7 via 5gz, and misc other devices... I didn't get my total bandwidth on 3.10.32-12, 3.10.34-1, but I've done 3.3GB down 0.9GB up since flashing 3.10.34-4. I've had no problems on any of those builds. It's been rock solid for me. I work from home two days a week (Tues and Thurs), wireless connection via my work OSX laptop. Since the 3.10.x series, I've noticed that WiFi has been noticeably faster. If there is a roll-back of the kernel, would it be possible to have a fork still with the latest kernel too... otherwise how will it be known when the issue is fixed, sorry to be a PitA. --=20 David P. On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Maxim Kharlamov wrote: > Clients: two android devices (Google Nexus 5 and SGS3), one Arch Linux > laptop, iPad, MacBook Pro (from time to time). > > > Regards, > Max > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aaron Wood wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Aaron Wood wrote: >> >> >> >> Up for 10 days on 3.10.32-12 (WNDR3800). Only have 2 devices that ru= n >> >> 2.4GHz, and it's only seen 2GB of traffic on SW00 in that time... Th= e >> 5GHz >> >> radio has had >5GB of traffic on it in the same time. No problems at >> all. >> > >> > >> > And I also have both 2.4 and 5GHz babel and guest SSIDs all turned off= . >> > >> > -Aaron >> >> Your clients are? >> >> So far there seems to be a significant trend towards osx being an issue.= .. >> >> >> -- >> Dave T=C3=A4ht >> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: >> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > --485b397dce33f7e26a04f62d68eb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have an OSX laptop on 5ghz, a Linux desktop and server v= ia ethernet, Linux Laptop via 5gz, Roku via 5gz, Nexus 7 via 5gz, and misc = other devices... I didn't get my total bandwidth on 3.10.32-12, 3.10.34= -1, but I've done 3.3GB down 0.9GB up since flashing 3.10.34-4. I'v= e had no problems on any of those builds. It's been rock solid for me. = I work from home two days a week (Tues and Thurs), wireless connection via = my work OSX laptop. Since the 3.10.x series, I've noticed that WiFi has= been noticeably faster. If there is a roll-back of the kernel, would it be= possible to have a fork still with the latest kernel too... otherwise how = will it be known when the issue is fixed, sorry to be a PitA.

--
David P.



On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Maxi= m Kharlamov <mcs@podsolnuh.biz> wrote:
Clients: two android devices (Google Nexus 5 and SGS3), on= e Arch Linux laptop, iPad, MacBook Pro (from time to time).


Reg= ards,
Max


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Dave Ta= ht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Up for 10 days on 3.10.32-12 (WNDR3800). =C2=A0Only have 2 devices that = run
>> 2.4GHz, and it's only seen 2GB of traffic on SW00 in that time= ... =C2=A0The 5GHz
>> radio has had >5GB of traffic on it in the same time. =C2=A0No = problems at all.
>
>
> And I also have both 2.4 and 5GHz babel and guest SSIDs all turned off= .
>
> -Aaron

Your clients are?

So far there seems to be a significant trend towards osx being an issue...<= br>


--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscrib= e.html


_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


--485b397dce33f7e26a04f62d68eb--