From: David Personette <dperson@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] notes on going for a stable release
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:51:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMybZqyz6aQD74M8cKudzGCtoTBTMPP1NLx94LmGmJuRu=yi9Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871u0aew48.fsf@toke.dk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4835 bytes --]
I agree with Toke on this, cerowrt with a single supported router was never
about mass adoption. I think everyone using it is in the self selected
group of people that knew enough about networking to find why their
internet connection was *breaking* for interactive use, then go out and buy
a router that cost 2x-3x what other similar specification consumer units
cost. As far as I recall, initial installation required TFTP. Not a real
hurdle for many of us, but quite a barrier to the normal consumer. I've
been using it for my primary router for over a year now, and have been very
happy with it's stability and reliability. I've had to roll back a few
builds, but no real issues otherwise. People that are here, are here to be
where all the new development of consumer level implementations of internet
protocols and things getting fixed is happening. My 2 cents.
--
David P.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>wrote:
> Christopher Robin <pheoni@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > ***Are we here for research and development, or are we here for final
> > implementation?
>
> I've always thought about CeroWRT as an R&D project. As Dave points out
> I don't think it's realistic to provide a "stable" release in the sense
> of having it upgraded and maintained. At least not as things stand now.
> However, designating a release as "stable" in the same way as the
> previous one (i.e. something that won't crash and where most or all of
> the advertised features (mostly) work) would probably be a good idea.
> In particular, crash bugs and things that are completely broken should
> probably be fixed?
>
>
> As far as my installation goes:
>
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/mips/unaligned_instructions
> 154737
> # uptime
> 10:39:18 up 5 days, 10:56, load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.04
> # dmesg | grep "TX DMA"
> [348064.371093] ath: phy0: Failed to stop TX DMA, queues=0x004!
> # dmesg | grep "checksum failed"
> [13551.957031] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [16072.535156] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [22734.054687] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [93252.820312] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [96253.570312] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [106396.003906] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [156808.253906] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [163650.000000] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [224205.101562] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [269216.191406] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [276718.035156] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [316807.695312] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [329890.929687] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [333792.148437] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [399208.269531] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [410070.828125] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [435757.078125] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [441458.539062] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
> [449560.417968] ICMPv6 checksum failed
> [2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0001 >
> 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:0000:0000:0000:0002]
>
>
> I've had to re-initialise the wifi a couple of times for no apparent
> reason, and one or two reboots necessary, but nothing that major...
>
> -Toke
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5554 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 6:07 Dave Taht
2014-01-14 8:37 ` Christopher Robin
2014-01-14 9:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-01-14 12:51 ` David Personette [this message]
2014-01-14 13:20 ` Rich Brown
2014-01-14 15:30 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-16 3:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-01-15 15:18 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-14 12:10 ` Juergen Botz
2014-01-14 15:10 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-14 12:36 ` David Personette
2014-01-15 4:11 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CAMybZqzs9ES9G23ke-PjU759wxbQNMytYa4EHmv0H8HqpPwwPQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-15 14:47 ` Dave Taht
2014-01-15 0:30 ` David Lang
2014-01-15 17:31 ` Jim Reisert AD1C
2014-01-20 15:00 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2014-01-20 15:15 ` [Cerowrt-devel] notes on going for a stable release/replacement router Rich Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMybZqyz6aQD74M8cKudzGCtoTBTMPP1NLx94LmGmJuRu=yi9Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dperson@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox