From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com (mail-ie0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DEDB201B71 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id e13so2913018iej.4 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:32:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=jD/pvylbCQH9Oz57d6mQ7azEl/7uu+BhEUCXVrjSBZg=; b=wZzfElnhUY9PVL6VJiV+/kg219SfRJyapIB3hzXwxcdMUr98pLrd/jMgD/pxfYtMur BbGw328OXuGxyHbvi0oZJxxHbXuGzeM30x99qZSjJsl8MHYXEv7ACF4En6VQTiQp6Bgl YECXLVfCxJESHswhYlXxjCmQfbyKgOSFJzmmccSJ0GYIa2R1nkW6nJDYIAG8lBzMnkgp my4Xhbk55ByqkamONC0aSrQn+q1s39n2gzJ+OWn7U2NJNwvPFWbVIhSD8qmL2yICxKYf GCL7iWwsLaTrYoAWoHD+f2LwQf8crVJnB5Fi1/CH9ZUJ7lUpojVnFiP50C9LdJ2eso9P bEVg== Received: by 10.50.33.138 with SMTP id r10mr3240576igi.6.1357777969937; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:32:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.145.202 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:32:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42A95341@CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42A95341@CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> From: Chris Lawrence Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:32:29 -0500 Message-ID: To: "" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt Modena 3.7.1-1 Field Report X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:32:50 -0000 I can report ipv6 is working well here as well on 6to4. I'm seeing the same mDNS issues Rich does but it's not a huge problem. Thanks Dave! The only other issue I've run into - a longstanding one upstream probably - is that the busybox ntp server doesn't work while ntpdate is installed (which means clients that use the ntp information distributed by DHCP don't get ntp service, since they can't connect to ntp on the box, leading to clock drift) - ntpdate probably should disable itself if busybox-ntpd is configured to run. Chris -- Chris Lawrence Website: http://www.cnlawrence.com/