From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-f43.google.com (mail-vb0-f43.google.com [209.85.212.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A38321F15B for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vbbfq11 with SMTP id fq11so4261625vbb.16 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:58:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=a4PjevsMVd5fIwni273Whmv2FNFS/pdVpxLoXDyFVio=; b=J2AuCNjpI8A562pxcktJfFoTJ3MiCgdyKm4QBZNeJB5ycqNE3Fm0QQssXoYwJ3aScv MqkKk5mTbh2Y4c6L2IoZCJV0HkVQ3DU7H8CMywqtDntwh9WqFAsZQfqjlTHw9/3IQzL4 nvXAB1/37mp64HWfG1aWbTDCT3cA3KF7XAz838qA7ZiWQEKf4b5nFhUEecP3SSq7s1nl 1LOPFFcGwwtLtzlTWqieQ6iVtKsW01OPkWVlSfM9YXNrZksBiDrbl/myqnL/VtDaIXwB W/TvApK11hNfWqilKEkVnCh1TExCd5Of6M7A+mGCp3+qmdAH5zSFDuypR/c8RDwpbAdw QDWA== Received: by 10.58.79.178 with SMTP id k18mr36855vex.3.1348095532014; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:58:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.14.38 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:58:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <50597190.4070800@googlemail.com> From: Chris Lawrence Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:58:31 -0400 Message-ID: To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: cerowrt-3.38-26 "sugarland" is out X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:58:53 -0000 I've only noticed one real problem thus far: radvd is still advertising incorrect subnet addresses for 6to4 connections (addresses that start with 0:0:0:$adv_subnet, which clearly are wrong since all the addresses should be under 2002: to be routable on the ipv6 Internet). The fix is simple: in /lib/netifd/proto/6to4.sh, line 162 should read: "$wancfg" "$subnet6" \ instead of the printf call that's there now. This is probably an upstream OpenWRT problem too. Chris -- Chris Lawrence Website: http://www.cnlawrence.com/