From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E4D21F14B for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ex4so5095994wid.17 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:18:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=solvent-llc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Z+jMBtCEQMG4rckvM9FzxeP8jNeG9x0pNeZbbHqckHg=; b=H3pbJANWM4C89Cr/ld2p0ifBXOEN6+wPGILvQoDJeHbagcm+Lwj6tE+17dM0s8CKGQ AilZzY257zvPYNjdw6DDSCFJP+1J+zmjadX5k/bT2hSKgvJXvNxawpMt7ol6H6OBHxmh Vrx/ZpWJS9WHuvlsV3auKZV02YD3O3MQOI10c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Z+jMBtCEQMG4rckvM9FzxeP8jNeG9x0pNeZbbHqckHg=; b=SWEfHDXrJEWoa1x92jFPQiQ5YJQdwo0szaAXUyvjm6+OtOdN++TgyrNUq+dCwp2G6J UtL03NaUgN50limcRxl/tORwu6hOZBCoGpXrvaKvvUtYUBiaTSmlzhN85zyLuvFZofRa qWsilF5myRkhOlag9AoNdAfTukiFOd3nsxRHhUjqPYiaCy/54akj6nsWL+FC1FJuMVdT lr1dkx2rnSQVPWu/Ls9K8CMDro2TK1uwkDRe7pjuuQRMikpUTdLVC7kWtuXmxP1sZX/W dUEc/l/morwy3RonYcs+Ekp2mm7Yd/dEWcTZMXUajR5xTlNN8zcmwh+/PxGNpCr5y0aL 8hlA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnCWBiucRpS7Ft89p3A+D/ObNALGKwC45z0bEdEkdmCDda27ZDh2BYJBKVnCgT2f8hT7Awu X-Received: by 10.194.6.161 with SMTP id c1mr2652172wja.89.1377782325022; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:18:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.122.10 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:18:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Luke Hamburg Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:18:24 -0400 Message-ID: To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4175a30fa18104e515f279 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] hardware suggestions? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:18:47 -0000 --047d7b4175a30fa18104e515f279 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dave, I'm interested in the Atom hardware you've had success with. $430US might be a lot for a typical home user but certainly not for someone who likes to experiment on the bleeding edge. I wonder if you've seen or tried Cero on these ? ( http://store.netgate.com/Netgate-FW-7541-P1846C83.aspx) Or do you build your own? I personally have several of those 7541's just running pfSense and they are wonderful pieces of kit. Luke On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > I have been on a quest for newer/faster home gw hardware > [ > ... > ] > and I have been using some atom based boxes with debian with great success > in the gigE range as well, but they cost about $430 each. > --047d7b4175a30fa18104e515f279 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dave, I'm interested in the Atom hardware y= ou've had success with. =A0$430US might be a lot for a typical home use= r but certainly not for someone who likes to experiment on the bleeding edg= e. I wonder if you've seen or tried Cero on these=A0? (http://store.netgate.com/Net= gate-FW-7541-P1846C83.aspx) Or do you build your own? I personally have= several of those 7541's just running pfSense and they are wonderful pi= eces of kit.

Luke


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:44 = PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

I have been on a= quest for newer/faster home gw hardware
[
...
]
and I have been using some atom= based boxes with debian with great success in the gigE range as well, but = they cost about $430 each.
--047d7b4175a30fa18104e515f279--