If minidlna will compile, and you have the time, could you include it in
the next release?
On May 5, 2013 6:28 AM, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Robert Bradley
> <robert.bradley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 24/04/13 16:46, Dave Taht wrote:
> >>
> >> There is a possibly related bug being discussed on the babel-users list
> >> with an
> >> easy fix.
> >>
> >> Not sure what kernel versions it happens on.
> >>
> >
> > I was seeing that bug on the quantal 3.5 kernel as well.  So far, testing
> > with the raring 3.8 kernel seems to fix both the unreachable route bug
> and
> > the random /128 route bugs.  My patched babeld also appears to work no
> worse
> > than the distro-provided 1.3.1 build.  That said, with both versions I
> see
> > that babeld switches to wireless routes and stays there if eth0 is
> > disconnected and later restored.
>
> Still stuck on this? I'm planning a new build this week with your
> atomic route stuff in it. babel 1.3.6 and 1.40 have been released.
>
> >
> > It may be time for me to try running the babeld HEAD code without the
> > patches and compare the behaviour of that to the patched version next...
> >
> >
> > --
> > Robert Bradley
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>