From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FEF121F104 for ; Sun, 5 May 2013 06:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id s10so2356235wey.31 for ; Sun, 05 May 2013 06:58:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=hafyzMmBi70HPyEgL0aOlr72svXg7nYUXT2At9f2kt0=; b=YmsPoGf9Elbh3TW7OcuBg+UeUJVUn9jyyO4lx2R+FsT+zG8fAwrP5+7UspeGtdGs0d Fv26PognynvxpANp6xnE/JL8wMgb529wxlyTLLuvtw0V4KIQd5FTwpyanHf67kqkcYcT Vqno0ik2Pk4OcAEJsfkCCK8v8oHpcnCuOO5n+6WKIKxsikYhKJfxjaUDJL9CTMAalzCf Y9QDyrfztcJj1VfvJSzvW5x2hspUPNg/oDhzLW8PD6BrkB634bT3pvhrCMiVQyKsLZW5 jM0t0GwwUbcoAjzt5zvwFl8KI4okg0i+IaRDr5VrKxY9TWvcuypUE90i8Hwy3Gnixekg LIxg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.178.162 with SMTP id cz2mr21308893wjc.27.1367762305234; Sun, 05 May 2013 06:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.165.41 with HTTP; Sun, 5 May 2013 06:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.165.41 with HTTP; Sun, 5 May 2013 06:58:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5177DDA8.8010801@gmail.com> <51794652.4030906@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 06:58:25 -0700 Message-ID: From: Daniel Ezell To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc318573ebd04dbf8fa54 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkeJQpRn/5NUx7tYoE8Yl1SVRTgi1SOjFxyreliwLinkE6NpoSJnFOnQngVKbjc0K6UW83n Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] atomic route updates? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 13:58:28 -0000 --089e013cc318573ebd04dbf8fa54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If minidlna will compile, and you have the time, could you include it in the next release? On May 5, 2013 6:28 AM, "Dave Taht" wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Robert Bradley > wrote: > > On 24/04/13 16:46, Dave Taht wrote: > >> > >> There is a possibly related bug being discussed on the babel-users lis= t > >> with an > >> easy fix. > >> > >> Not sure what kernel versions it happens on. > >> > > > > I was seeing that bug on the quantal 3.5 kernel as well. So far, testi= ng > > with the raring 3.8 kernel seems to fix both the unreachable route bug > and > > the random /128 route bugs. My patched babeld also appears to work no > worse > > than the distro-provided 1.3.1 build. That said, with both versions I > see > > that babeld switches to wireless routes and stays there if eth0 is > > disconnected and later restored. > > Still stuck on this? I'm planning a new build this week with your > atomic route stuff in it. babel 1.3.6 and 1.40 have been released. > > > > > It may be time for me to try running the babeld HEAD code without the > > patches and compare the behaviour of that to the patched version next..= . > > > > > > -- > > Robert Bradley > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > -- > Dave T=E4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --089e013cc318573ebd04dbf8fa54 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If minidlna will compile, and you have the time, could you i= nclude it in the next release?

On May 5, 2013 6:28 AM, "Dave Taht" &l= t;dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:=
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Robert Bradley
<robert.bradley1@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:
> On 24/04/13 16:46, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> There is a possibly related bug being discussed on the babel-users= list
>> with an
>> easy fix.
>>
>> Not sure what kernel versions it happens on.
>>
>
> I was seeing that bug on the quantal 3.5 kernel as well. =A0So far, te= sting
> with the raring 3.8 kernel seems to fix both the unreachable route bug= and
> the random /128 route bugs. =A0My patched babeld also appears to work = no worse
> than the distro-provided 1.3.1 build. =A0That said, with both versions= I see
> that babeld switches to wireless routes and stays there if eth0 is
> disconnected and later restored.

Still stuck on this? I'm planning a new build this week with your
atomic route stuff in it. babel 1.3.6 and 1.40 have been released.

>
> It may be time for me to try running the babeld HEAD code without the<= br> > patches and compare the behaviour of that to the patched version next.= ..
>
>
> --
> Robert Bradley
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@l= ists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



--
Dave T=E4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscrib= e.html
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
--089e013cc318573ebd04dbf8fa54--