From: Alijah Ballard <alijahb@gmail.com>
To: David Personette <dperson@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] I've always liked the idea of doing up building-wide networks
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:35:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOGcCtCOddbCzKQcFOu40qv=UuNqw6zAChD8kPtvEGuA13g-NQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMybZqzSMACrLmUmXbCBCOqG979HZbYdiZ3PKvSdBdqPjZbebQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1525 bytes --]
As I don't watch G+ or Facebook. On the list is prefered.
Thanks for all of the work you have done so far.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:46 AM, David Personette <dperson@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I at least liked both the links here on the list.
>
> --
> David P.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ... In particular when it came to getting minimal interference on all
>> the wifi access points. It is better to have fewer, better wifi APs
>> with a co-ordinated channel allocation strategy in an apartment
>> building than everybody installing one willy-nilly.
>>
>> http://www.frankston.com/public/?name=20140717-0146
>>
>> BTW: When I find an interesting link, these days, I tend to just put
>> it on my g+ rather than the email lists, and tend to feel I'm wasting
>> other people's bandwidth by doing it on the list - although sometimes
>> a good discussion is sparked. Should I stop forwarding stuff like this
>> (and the mit paper) to the list?
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>>
>> NSFW:
>> https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2862 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-18 16:13 Dave Taht
2014-07-18 16:46 ` David Personette
2014-07-18 17:35 ` Alijah Ballard [this message]
2014-07-18 23:25 ` David Lang
2014-07-19 0:31 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOGcCtCOddbCzKQcFOu40qv=UuNqw6zAChD8kPtvEGuA13g-NQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alijahb@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dperson@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox