From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92F1521F3F2 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l6so3673768qcy.11 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=E6oa07AXf4seMHuNTHqHapZDjHz7Ein3PuEwSZHzyN4=; b=gu4q2lKuh7j5RAlARnY0Fr0s219jkcVDNS8D//X6so7iDQzAy0n3P7GJ+C+307da9N 3wodb14lZa/9MQm/TgosTil1wj6QqDu81znh6vRzailFFnwpE6xzloJ/xqvUamt+CGt6 aXCdZqz+UxOByQaVp6Yojzbt69PSeMh94wPQyARuqfaywq/Vd3vVeTRnApIkYGFgLpeR TjsWBZw976Y+LDILVTUHqatqpC88blYU+1pG1Tog8S5U6Y7fsWPQaiLFnnQMJ/hyKjBk DQWwmm8Ic9KsIxNx3HOF3A2uyRF6agYqFxF0fAez6TUH+kFkEyX361SGH7Mco/S7Kf0F UWnA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.43.118 with SMTP id d109mr10386801qga.10.1405704943296; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.163.136 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:35:43 -0500 Message-ID: From: Alijah Ballard To: David Personette Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a92f2cdf14304fe7b2f5d Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] I've always liked the idea of doing up building-wide networks X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:35:44 -0000 --001a113a92f2cdf14304fe7b2f5d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As I don't watch G+ or Facebook. On the list is prefered. Thanks for all of the work you have done so far. On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:46 AM, David Personette wrote: > I at least liked both the links here on the list. > > -- > David P. > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> ... In particular when it came to getting minimal interference on all >> the wifi access points. It is better to have fewer, better wifi APs >> with a co-ordinated channel allocation strategy in an apartment >> building than everybody installing one willy-nilly. >> >> http://www.frankston.com/public/?name=3D20140717-0146 >> >> BTW: When I find an interesting link, these days, I tend to just put >> it on my g+ rather than the email lists, and tend to feel I'm wasting >> other people's bandwidth by doing it on the list - although sometimes >> a good discussion is sparked. Should I stop forwarding stuff like this >> (and the mit paper) to the list? >> >> -- >> Dave T=C3=A4ht >> >> NSFW: >> https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_ind= ecent.article >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > --001a113a92f2cdf14304fe7b2f5d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As I don't watch G+ or Facebook. On the list is prefer= ed.

Thanks for all of the work you have done so far.


On Fr= i, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:46 AM, David Personette <dperson@gmail.com> wrote:
I at least liked both the l= inks here on the list.
--
David P.


On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Dave T= aht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
... In particular when it came to getting minimal interference on all
the wifi access points. It is better to have fewer, better wifi APs
with a co-ordinated channel allocation strategy in an apartment
building than everybody installing one willy-nilly.

http://www.frankston.com/public/?name=3D20140717-0146

BTW: When I find an interesting link, these days, I tend to just put
it on my g+ rather than the email lists, and tend to feel I'm wasting other people's bandwidth by doing it on the list - although sometimes a good discussion is sparked. Should I stop forwarding stuff like this
(and the mit paper) to the list?

--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorshi= p/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Ce= rowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


--001a113a92f2cdf14304fe7b2f5d--