From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-x22a.google.com (mail-qe0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D172021A8 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:14:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qe0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b4so5887246qen.1 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:14:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bztnX6ky32Fk1EqoMa9froe8q29985rhYOxMq3kgJpY=; b=n9t1z+taxubYAgllB6RJwOwstg35vjtLPANQzd/+D18dHUHbM3QNKJjFyALZlAETh+ FD5zcFJkrpQW1Fpy5dkTmpGdt/5ZOhsaYYpyXgpx5UVXe4rWf3rOcT1AuKEYvERuQS/Y dHRgWQCcDutCdJ7kZvOfvsgYQXEHB+iNBV33SEvNNWQ/Qp98msXxY8CDdn5h+m5PqDAF Hkg6PViCQiChD26Fm1kiprSEVKJAO4yhAFwBB8mZO5Oyvt8cYBtZZZKhj1Pf4MWQg+xh PVZTw2fTg6cQz3FzPzLF7tK04wtXsWnYwpxzG7lkjjfpqme7qeLNa+adTHKyyMCB421v 8WeQ== X-Received: by 10.224.25.80 with SMTP id y16mr20571306qab.103.1389460475186; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:14:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from richs-mbp-2018.home.lan ([64.223.225.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r4sm19000055qeu.20.2014.01.11.09.14.33 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:14:34 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) From: Rich Brown In-Reply-To: <49DBDBE7-BF76-4823-B723-670935A55833@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:14:32 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4B0976EC-5224-4E81-B5DF-96A85424FB6E@gmail.com> <49DBDBE7-BF76-4823-B723-670935A55833@gmx.de> To: Sebastian Moeller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] VDSL X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:14:46 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:14:46 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:14:46 -0000 Hi Sebastian, >> In the new pages, I propose removing the VDSL choice, leaving: >>=20 >> - =93ATM (any kind of DSL link)=94 and=20 >> - =93None=94 >=20 > Well, that looks like a decent recommendation for the wiki. The = SQM configuration page still needs to expose all three values, atm, = ethernet, and none so that people can actually change things=85 Ahah. What=92s the difference between =93Ethernet=94 and =93None=94? I = had thought there were two link layer adaptations (ATM, and None, with = the possibility of some number of overhead bytes. Rich=