From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x241.google.com (mail-qt0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381313B29F for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:09:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x241.google.com with SMTP id 38so534443qte.2 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:09:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; bh=s3+DqSBRAjnt4l+mwCuAj7uRsFVZD0HmS/dK1yrU50o=; b=aADbTW1beK6ahLCL50wwuhEe5GVF/vKW8GNcHDVkBItjXrv3DkRPcvfamYUM35LAmH qiSFqR3PVnKzZvCFTZntmZGC2uXaX1dy9OEGRbr8NiSL1wbCmYPbkKQK5qEXlZ6C7I2Y izNcKoEdnW5hrEZOoPO6YahMfr+BA9oaeue4qWkgjpM16qU8K7/TyPpEd9po8+cLGQhN QiPqhakAVCTSrYS90PvOASEnBKQYOqHK2Tdk6dpNQz6UC+S0ct2JnLBtxzXIbsYexLHZ xpWfzEVZll9N1psRlZtow+d04A7uSqUjVIpkaLzpI0i4lPdHyxPyv+yU51QgCZG6itin isMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=s3+DqSBRAjnt4l+mwCuAj7uRsFVZD0HmS/dK1yrU50o=; b=D/+IlIFTlzw0QJF6eSBkh15kYLuSko/MhyED2ov+jVa7jfmPzjiFqTtCp7CFYiGBIP fNqjdG37acIv4WFrXWgEBKB941EqCJGYF3NURFJlz0cO5H0fmli2/HdhiYlKsLGvmd1c d/pet64KuHQpYUpLA45pIyCyxT1S+FZZOn59cC1nXB0Rx2UxE+hgnjhA4Lw4uIXGJwJr 4ETSX2NUvvaRlaYlBiCdzm4v2aW89gYBL6BA1Q2fUKrvGU8HPELNthbpeO2iKEDi/wtJ uCxhQAKyfdRVA+NNA7JIWOYeLDzvAataADAcWRtGGN5vcibNS58xJPqSVnANV2KFib85 +/ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkRN/nG9Yf32Dg3fx1pwPGLMHYitHhAItqQxcyuS7gd9LZCv31npPd6azncITrsRg== X-Received: by 10.200.56.55 with SMTP id q52mr28824158qtb.23.1474992594589; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richs-mbp-5177.lan (pool-70-16-106-139.port.east.myfairpoint.net. [70.16.106.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s40sm1567540qtc.3.2016.09.27.09.09.52 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:09:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Rich Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:09:51 -0400 To: cerowrt-devel Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] netperf server configuration X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:09:55 -0000 > Dave T=C3=A4ht recently wrote: >=20 > I just put a netperf server up in linode's freemont, ca, cloud (kvm > paravirtualized hardware), with sch_fq enabled, ecn disabled, and bbr > as the default cc. (reno and cubic are also allowed) That raises the question about the "proper" configuration for a netperf = server. I run the server at netperf.bufferbloat.net. It's a plain-vanilla OpenVZ = VPS on a (Ramnode.com) server in Atlanta, running Ubuntu 15.10 server. = Network config as-is, out of the box - I haven't done any tweaking. Are there changes I might/should make? Thanks. Rich=