From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A465021F220
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by labon10 with SMTP id on10so22946667lab.2
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=s7DaH6wSlUBL57c68KzJXBVbJ973dieqZL+mJB1haKg=;
	b=XYUvWTNllTqoR1qPaiO1OC3LmG5hHGkh7C4gSDfXTj2KR4vxvrsFNZsApHqIuWqzHF
	/jloklUfqpV6w5tZXG7N3IJT9xcWO6kbd+eiracreu6kcBVqgYHvXHYc1DFhZ8Byhnyf
	8aaNMeeDlQH0/Vt59GdCLQJrl0T7hXuMHoQ0zThjeFQBOTRyZcFr2Q/zGI5vSnSzG6J4
	of6oggpYG9yhm4WK7og8H4lDe7dkc1uSXuFwBa5tDqktLirl4265jZOUup+3MzZUJcjE
	KrsPAhvoDyQG0YIYKKY9b3EqXkvujuacdjdUq9BihM5pDze1EuUy8W7dqAUbOOtu0bgh
	Cr4A==
X-Received: by 10.112.181.231 with SMTP id dz7mr79168982lbc.47.1427076655532; 
	Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (37-136-12-37.rev.dnainternet.fi.
	[37.136.12.37])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o8sm566619lal.24.2015.03.22.19.10.54
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503221844590.22474@nftneq.ynat.uz>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 04:10:52 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D10FD962-461E-43DF-A45E-C4EAF8630685@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw40JoJLZK_=c14v7OdZrnUJrkvzk=-hxYKP0QT=T=5i0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<08BAF198-87C5-42B8-8899-53F34E47156E@gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1503221844590.22474@nftneq.ynat.uz>
To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] archer c7 v2, policing, hostapd,
	test openwrt build
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 02:11:26 -0000


> On 23 Mar, 2015, at 03:45, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>=20
> are we running into performance issues with fq_codel? I thought all =
the problems were with HTB or ingress shaping.

Cake is, in part, a response to the HTB problem; it is a few percent =
more efficient so far than an equivalent HTB+fq_codel combination.  It =
will have a few other novel features, too.

Bobbie is a response to the ingress-shaping problem.  A policer (with no =
queue) can be run without involving an IFB device, which we believe has =
a large overhead.

 - Jonathan Morton