From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: "Török Edwin" <edwin+ml-cerowrt@etorok.net>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] cerowrt 3.3.8-17: nice latency improvements, some issues with bind
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:20:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D247743C-68C7-41A8-80C1-5F51302054D1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502F6279.1090708@etorok.net>
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 12:38 pm, Török Edwin wrote:
> Shouldn't wireless N be able to do 200 - 300 Mbps though? If I enable debugging in iwl4965 I see that it
> starts TX aggregation, so not sure whats wrong (router or laptop?). With encryption off I can get at most 160 Mbps.
That's only the raw data rate - many non-ideal effects conspire to reduce this by at least half in practice.
I don't think anyone has ever seen the full theoretical throughput on wireless - at this point it's just a marketing number to indicate "this one is newer and better" to the technically illiterate.
- Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-18 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-13 6:08 [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.3.8-17 is released Dave Taht
2012-08-13 16:06 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2012-08-13 16:20 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-15 17:23 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-15 22:53 ` dpreed
2012-08-15 22:57 ` William Katsak
2012-08-16 4:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-16 11:08 ` William Katsak
2012-08-16 17:02 ` dpreed
2012-08-20 18:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-16 4:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-16 4:58 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-16 6:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-20 18:13 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-16 4:08 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-16 5:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-20 18:24 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-21 2:33 ` dpreed
2012-08-21 2:44 ` Marchon
2012-08-21 5:28 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-22 18:23 ` dpreed
2012-08-22 18:54 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-22 19:23 ` Kenneth Finnegan
2012-08-22 20:44 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-21 5:23 ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-08-17 8:52 ` [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.3.8-17: nice latency improvements, some issues with bind Török Edwin
2012-08-17 18:05 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-17 19:05 ` Török Edwin
2012-08-17 19:52 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-17 20:13 ` Török Edwin
2012-08-18 20:16 ` Michael Richardson
2012-08-20 20:16 ` david
2012-08-20 20:41 ` George Lambert
2012-08-20 20:48 ` david
2012-08-20 21:27 ` George Lambert
2012-08-20 23:19 ` Michael Richardson
2012-08-21 22:03 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2012-08-21 22:31 ` George Lambert
2012-08-22 1:21 ` Michael Richardson
2012-08-18 9:38 ` Török Edwin
2012-08-18 10:20 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2012-08-18 17:07 ` Dave Taht
2012-08-25 13:56 ` Török Edwin
2012-08-25 18:09 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D247743C-68C7-41A8-80C1-5F51302054D1@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=edwin+ml-cerowrt@etorok.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox