From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485A121F411 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 05:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle.lan ([134.2.89.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MAy40-1XK99p0FrI-00A1yD; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:07:13 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:07:11 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: =?windows-1252?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:oBucUgxIufByb9DiKNa72+y5S0H2AcnT6DNJ09maV4ZGMFXcc8z nwY8h7dJbSKlRKqOhM7cM8XUYPHmH9bCTUQi5Z6kOxadGN5tMGdkZ5IxzmqAPkRiSovlFlU osn5iRKfi5+GDjm6JjFpCuWcJel8NG7jaqV4lU3VMFk5hvJ8pNoxBEVJpP6+o0YZBk4UeZ0 M9VgtG7IoTB3GwsTJstjw== Cc: cerowrt@lists.bufferbloat.net, "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [bug #442] X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:07:27 -0000 Hi Dave, On Jul 24, 2014, at 07:48 , Dave Taht wrote: > So far as I have heard the latest build IS more stable than anything > prior under conditions of low signal strength os OSX. (how's everyone > doing this week?) Still all fine (but uptime is 5 days, the last time I needed ~20 = days for the queue to get stuck). Also I note that for me the problem = typically develops on the 2.4GHz radio, which only hosts am old nexus7 = and two nexus 4 (nexi?). The macbook and macbook pro on the 5GHz radio = seems rather stable. I guess what I want to say is that the macs might = be good in flushing out this issue, but it is not a mac only issue ;) I = only tested under IPv4, but this seems to work well already... >=20 > I had long suspected we were actually seeing several bugs masquerading = as one. >=20 > new hope: >=20 > https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/41815 So, I will wait for a fortnight of uptime, before switching to a = potential newer cerowrt version, just to see whether I can break = 3.10.48-2=85 Best Regards Sebastian >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=E4ht >=20 > NSFW: = https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indec= ent.article > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel