Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Why we are discussing ARM
       [not found] <mailman.1398.1466735830.3642.cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
@ 2016-06-24 14:10 ` Rich Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rich Brown @ 2016-06-24 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cerowrt-devel

To avoid us wasting time on an unsuitable candidate, I want to un-recommend the WiTi Board from www.mqmaker.com. Although it was designed for good performance and attractive price, it has a couple serious flaws:

- Wrong architecture - ramips/mt7621
- Flakey company - they met their kickstarter goal, and shipped units. But I think they set their unit price too low, and now don't have any extra dough left over to support the product. 

I own one, it works fine in my limited testing. But I am not buying another...

Rich

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-06-24 14:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <mailman.1398.1466735830.3642.cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2016-06-24 14:10 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Why we are discussing ARM Rich Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox