From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EF021F09E for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:19:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from hms-beagle-3.home.lan ([217.86.106.211]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LjuR3-1VH85p1IDZ-00bpqR for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:19:36 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:19:35 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zwGEzzS9BoFHNO7nNK56t0gTTk2iGztDPQjRBK3sgvUGcm/HG9k ZBZoK1srRNWzb5/eGzv9rNsJyUhKaTcwFYsKJjXD/MgQLK7AidwyE9f86ISY1/di9qVEpeg rUriaiZtdYUnIN/YnVGH4kb5/14Q8wNeEsOf2MJIB+2JCnF7zHyVBcAQXERY36eAKUtyYqM UNQyaH8FUVDhKNTt2fLFw== Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:19:39 -0000 Hi Dave, On Dec 16, 2013, at 20:46 , Dave Taht wrote: > I have long used "5" as an indicator that the 5ghz channel was better. > This goes back to a long thread on nanog, like 4? 5? years ago, where > the hope was to train users that "5" was better. >=20 > Well, it's turned out that 5 is frequently better, but not always, AND > that clients tend to go for the shortest of the SSIDs available. So a > thought would be to create another ad-hoc standard for deprecating 2.4 > ghz, and have the shorter SSID be the 5ghz one. >=20 > Ideas for the 2ghz channel: >=20 > CEROwrt-legacy > CEROwrt2 >=20 > I'm not huge on "legacy" because it's rather long but am stuck for > standards, I'd like a default 2.4 ghz SSID that clearly indicates the > real use to which 2.4ghz is suitable, like: > CEROwrt-GET-OFF-MY-BABY-MONITOR-YOU-FREAK >=20 > ideas for another ssid naming standard slightly longer than a single > digit that would make sense to mom? While being not really for mom, I went for name_2.4GHz and name_5GHz. Pretty clear, and the her name is shorter :) best Sebastian >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=E4ht >=20 > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: = http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel