From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9F721F0B2 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:36:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from h200.viagenie.ca (h200.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.200]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CA9840367; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 09:36:24 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DACC7758-7C68-4AAF-BAB6-A32DD7E9D971" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: JF Tremblay In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 09:36:18 -0500 Message-Id: References: <54EE258E.8060302@gmail.com> <201502272200.t1RM0Aru020484@maildrop31.somerville.occnc.com> <7ia8zvjkdq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [homenet] Routing protocol comparison document X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:36:52 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_DACC7758-7C68-4AAF-BAB6-A32DD7E9D971 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >=20 > I currently plan to enable some form of ipv6 translation by default in > the next version of cerowrt - and make direct access optional - (or > the reverse! I'm easy ) if somehow we get it together enough to > actually have a way to do a cerowrt-scale effort again. >=20 > Any objections here? Suggestions for how to make one of the ipv6 > translation techniques work right? By IPv6 translation, do you mean a NAT66 stateless prefix translation as = described in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6296 = ?=20 That could be useful for people like me behind a 6RD /60, I wouldn=E2=80=99= t mind trying it with an internal ULA and see how it behaves. Not sure = how current implementations behave though.=20 JF --Apple-Mail=_DACC7758-7C68-4AAF-BAB6-A32DD7E9D971 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>= wrote:

I = currently plan to enable some form of ipv6 translation by default in
the next version of cerowrt - and make direct access optional = - (or
the reverse! I'm easy ) if somehow we get it = together enough to
actually have a way to do a = cerowrt-scale effort again.

Any objections = here? Suggestions for how to make one of the ipv6
translation techniques work right?

By = IPv6 translation, do you mean a NAT66 stateless prefix translation as = described in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6296 ? 

That could be useful for = people like me behind a 6RD /60, I wouldn=E2=80=99t mind trying it with = an internal ULA and see how it behaves. Not sure how current = implementations behave though. 

JF


= --Apple-Mail=_DACC7758-7C68-4AAF-BAB6-A32DD7E9D971--