From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful"
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 18:00:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E44C11DD-68F9-4340-8F99-18D2894FE36B@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F5EF7B.4000006@mti-systems.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1845 bytes --]
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/3/2015 12:20 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How can we fix this user perception, short of re-prioritizing ping in
>>> sqm-scripts?
>>
>> IMHO, ping should go at the same priority as general traffic - the
>> default class, DSCP=0. When I send one, I am asking whether a random
>> packet can get to a given address and get a response back. I can imagine
>> having a command-line parameter to set the DSCP to another value of my
>> choosing.
>
> I generally agree, however ...
>
> The DSCP of the response isn't controllable though, and likely the DSCP
> that is ultimately received will not be the one that was sent, so it
> can't be as simple as echoing back the same one. Ping doesn't tell you
> latency components in the forward or return path (some other protocols
> can do this though).
>
> So, setting the DSCP on the outgoing request may not be all that useful,
> depending on what the measurement is really for.
Note that I didn’t say “I demand”… :-)
I share the perception that ping is useful when it’s useful, and that it is at best an approximation. If I can get a packet to the destination and a response back, and I know the time I sent it and the time I received the response, I know exactly that - messages went out and back and took some amount of total time. I don’t know anything about the specifics of the path, of buffers en route, or delay time in the target. Traceroute tells me a little more, at the cost of a more intense process. In places I use ping, I tend to send a number of them over a period of time and observe on the statistics that result, not a single ping result.
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-03 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 3:57 [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2015-03-02 4:00 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] " Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-02 4:05 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-02 4:06 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " David Lang
2015-03-02 9:40 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] " Brian Trammell
2015-03-02 10:17 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-02 10:54 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Jonathan Morton
2015-03-02 12:44 ` dpreed
2015-03-02 14:45 ` Brian Trammell
2015-03-02 18:41 ` David Lang
2015-03-03 6:45 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-03-04 8:14 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-02 21:53 ` Joe Touch
2015-03-02 23:14 ` David Lang
2015-03-02 23:25 ` Joe Touch
2015-03-02 23:34 ` David Lang
2015-03-03 0:07 ` Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-02 10:47 ` Dave Dolson
2015-03-02 10:49 ` Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-02 18:36 ` David Lang
[not found] ` <md2fsa$o1s$1@ger.gmane.org>
2015-03-02 20:33 ` Dave Dolson
2015-03-02 20:39 ` David Lang
2015-03-02 20:38 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-04 8:12 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-03 17:20 ` Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-03 17:29 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Wesley Eddy
2015-03-03 18:00 ` Fred Baker (fred) [this message]
2015-03-04 5:24 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] [Bloat] " Dave Taht
2015-03-05 18:56 ` Curtis Villamizar
2015-03-05 19:50 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [aqm] " Rich Brown
2015-03-04 17:34 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] [Bloat] " dpreed
2015-03-04 19:45 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-05 20:38 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Matt Taggart
2015-03-05 20:53 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E44C11DD-68F9-4340-8F99-18D2894FE36B@cisco.com \
--to=fred@cisco.com \
--cc=aqm@ietf.org \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=wes@mti-systems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox