Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] [Bloat]  ping loss "considered harmful"
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 18:00:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E44C11DD-68F9-4340-8F99-18D2894FE36B@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F5EF7B.4000006@mti-systems.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1845 bytes --]


> On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:
> 
> On 3/3/2015 12:20 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> How can we fix this user perception, short of re-prioritizing ping in
>>> sqm-scripts?
>> 
>> IMHO, ping should go at the same priority as general traffic - the
>> default class, DSCP=0. When I send one, I am asking whether a random
>> packet can get to a given address and get a response back. I can imagine
>> having a command-line parameter to set the DSCP to another value of my
>> choosing.
> 
> I generally agree, however ...
> 
> The DSCP of the response isn't controllable though, and likely the DSCP
> that is ultimately received will not be the one that was sent, so it
> can't be as simple as echoing back the same one.  Ping doesn't tell you
> latency components in the forward or return path (some other protocols
> can do this though).
> 
> So, setting the DSCP on the outgoing request may not be all that useful,
> depending on what the measurement is really for.

Note that I didn’t say “I demand”… :-)

I share the perception that ping is useful when it’s useful, and that it is at best an approximation. If I can get a packet to the destination and a response back, and I know the time I sent it and the time I received the response, I know exactly that - messages went out and back and took some amount of total time. I don’t know anything about the specifics of the path, of buffers en route, or delay time in the target. Traceroute tells me a little more, at the cost of a more intense process. In places I use ping, I tend to send a number of them over a period of time and observe on the statistics that result, not a single ping result.

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-02  3:57 [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2015-03-02  4:00 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] " Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-02  4:05 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-02  4:06 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " David Lang
2015-03-02  9:40 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] " Brian Trammell
2015-03-02 10:17   ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-02 10:54     ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Jonathan Morton
2015-03-02 12:44       ` dpreed
2015-03-02 14:45       ` Brian Trammell
2015-03-02 18:41         ` David Lang
2015-03-03  6:45     ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-03-04  8:14       ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-02 21:53   ` Joe Touch
2015-03-02 23:14     ` David Lang
2015-03-02 23:25       ` Joe Touch
2015-03-02 23:34         ` David Lang
2015-03-03  0:07           ` Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-02 10:47 ` Dave Dolson
2015-03-02 10:49   ` Andrew Mcgregor
2015-03-02 18:36     ` David Lang
     [not found] ` <md2fsa$o1s$1@ger.gmane.org>
2015-03-02 20:33   ` Dave Dolson
2015-03-02 20:39     ` David Lang
2015-03-02 20:38   ` Dave Taht
2015-03-04  8:12     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-03 17:20 ` Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-03 17:29   ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Wesley Eddy
2015-03-03 18:00     ` Fred Baker (fred) [this message]
2015-03-04  5:24       ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] [Bloat] " Dave Taht
2015-03-05 18:56         ` Curtis Villamizar
2015-03-05 19:50           ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [aqm] " Rich Brown
2015-03-04 17:34       ` [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] [Bloat] " dpreed
2015-03-04 19:45         ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-05 20:38 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Matt Taggart
2015-03-05 20:53   ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E44C11DD-68F9-4340-8F99-18D2894FE36B@cisco.com \
    --to=fred@cisco.com \
    --cc=aqm@ietf.org \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=wes@mti-systems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox