From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C44CB21F2DE
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 23:40:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
Sender: toke@toke.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1416987243; bh=gJcLw0yHL6ppElTCrl22pQF0nOh/IhU0xKeWsMsGbD4=;
	h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To;
	b=l779SDFP/R2PxjUUoEn3tvs9g5bpW/4qHH0nCsmG8CDp93Fv8On2qzrVZy1sMQGYM
	L/+RDfE0KTlUFMBIG/ja+kItYDv3D0Bva3S88Td7iSRZOBeZiitH4EG4JZQ+TJj6Qz
	xk7ktK6DSBWe0/zD1ejDltjmUxVz99wekuQ1QQ5s=
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw68EUNHyJRrKYZuc0egXZaC_9oUysqZEN-YkNfNhc6ERA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw68EUNHyJRrKYZuc0egXZaC_9oUysqZEN-YkNfNhc6ERA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:40:14 +0100
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org" <babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Message-ID: <E4B2D8FC-D37B-427F-BC18-2FB79C31AA33@toke.dk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 confusion with source specific gateways.
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 07:40:54 -0000


>default from :: via fe80::201:5cff:ee62:b646 dev ge00  proto static=20
>metric 1024
># should I even have a default route at all?

The source on this is actually ::/128 so it's not a default route in the =
sense that it will forward arbitrary traffic through it. It is needed for=
 IPv6 packets that originate on the host but where the application doesn'=
t specify an address to bind to. To see that, try removing it and then pi=
ng6 something you don't have a specific route to...


>Now, where my brain crashes: shouldn't 2601:c:ce00:9d1::/64 actually
>be something like
>
>2601:c:ce00:9d01::/64 not, 2601:c:ce00:9d1::/64?
>
>(see the 01?)?

2601:c:ce00:9d01 is 2601:000c:ce00:9d01
2601:c:ce00:9d1 is 2601:000c:ce00:09d1

So no? :)

-Toke