From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6EDB21F3A9; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:05:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk Sender: toke@toke.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1426201499; bh=rGFQ2XNhyRlSXvpkbjgi2h/Nfyjuspqn/R8OSBWpX44=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Date:To; b=TMkg4dcMiWwYHvepFe00mgaZbpH2jMFpj+2ZVqRPlEAwBhkIVzJqmJtLDdhGJX+AD 0S2IDWX6SRmDSnGcgzDRtZ4IfTs+M+bqUoqHBWqvOlv0lejvK1hJedJfjiOlClAIyT jDPJNWdJtsSfJhTC79RUSac30LLHipGdoHpy7JKk= In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:04:56 +0100 To: Dave Taht , bloat , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Message-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] marketing #102 - giving netperf-wrapper a better name? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 23:05:37 -0000 >seemingly still whatever the programmer called it when he wrote the >first sketchy version, one step up from "foo"' This is accurate, BTW. I'm terrible at naming... Do yeah, what Dave said - suggestions welcome! :) -Toke