From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0154E21F112 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:54:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from u-089-d091.biologie.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.89.91]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lmwpk-1VItpo3B6K-00h3MQ for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:54:28 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:54:28 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Maciej Soltysiak X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:biIXWHjTFoPXmLN/Lb0hEZHck/06RypMQDhLUK+bpHtK9KC/kkS OBhgL/mbO+vaJAU4T0FHacTPmlKsfL4WZ0EtNaydpVNFqiVXQibo8BqOkV5eCLrD7exSo3l Lus0CgwJAA3+NlVicNOPz7VdMQCXzZ0GY6kHi/yT5dUv6fl+NhqUsVNHB1dT6WxmRnD9rPj TsxE9KkToJ6cDQj86cEPA== Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Intuition of this guy improved his 1, 5 Mbit DSL line X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:54:33 -0000 Hi Maciej, On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:23 , Maciej Soltysiak = wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Story from slashodot: > A guy moved to a low speed DSL connection. When describing what he's > done to make it work better, among other things, he mentioned he > configured QoS to be below his cap. He put 1100 Mb limit on a 1500 Mb > line. So he is shaping down to 73.34% of his link, probably following the = instructions from = http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/qos-tutorial.68795/ . =46rom = personal experience I can say that with cerowrt's aqm and the proper = link layer I get decent latency results with just shaping down to 95% of = link rate. I just checked and it does not seem that the current tomato fork = he uses takes the link layer into account=85. So trying cerowrt seems a = worthwhile experiment for him to undertake. But from the writeup I = assume he is quite happy as is and coming down from 32Mbit/s no matter = what 1.5Mbit/s will feel slower. >=20 > He's not using the benefits of fq_codel on his TomatoUSB but he's on > the right track. >=20 > His intuition is good: > = http://www.tidbitsfortechs.com/2013/12/surviving-internet-on-low-speed-dsl= / >=20 > Would be cool for him to check out latest openwrt if his device can = handle it. >=20 > Best regards, > Maciej > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel