From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7067D21F3CA for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 13:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle.home.lan ([93.194.237.210]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LtZcC-1YIzVF1atA-010tE7; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:37:38 +0200 From: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:37:30 +0200 References: To: =?windows-1252?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= , cerowrt-devel Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YuSJSYW+GCsnApjen5MeQoIWAjRxM9g8Me/yGyGGKfhLbXAPJpR tknMB95w+0Apwxsc8cAkr28ydwkXiEh9wyKfhEb+3ayJ9fkOhcrmo0LK+RvonaL4wbL8LcY DLg9P8zpkNCOO9ruUq9TQyNsQTuD82XeDwQB0KPmS/78xB61PB1cLYUKkBRwAJfgIzFz0us 1oZY9HWj4DU4glqxw5iSg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: next round of SQM changes X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:38:10 -0000 Hi List, I am again in need of testers for SQM. So far SQM tried to deduce from = /etc/config/sqm which interfaces it potentially needed to stop itself = on, which did not work very reliably, since it is easy to just change = the interface name in an existing config file and all traces of the = interface on which SQM was started originally disappear. So instead now, = SQM will stop itself on all interfaces it currently runs on, and then = will only start itself on those interfaces that are actually configured = and enabled in the GUI/UCI file. That hopefully gets rid of the spurious = leftover HTBs and IFBs that some users had noticed. I would be great if anybody experiences problems with the new = code to holler so I can go fix things up=85 Best Regards Sebastian P.S.: Dave I first sent this from the wrong emial account, please just = delete the message held in moderation ;)=