* [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release @ 2013-12-02 1:07 Dave Taht 2013-12-02 10:44 ` Sebastian Moeller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2013-12-02 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for dnsmasq. It is completely untested. + fresh merge with openwrt ++ bunch of ath9k fixes + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs) - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436 plan to update the machine involved to this version. hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someone with comcast ipv6 to try this on.... - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried it will do so shortly - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack in openwrt in general, but no details. I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now and thursday. In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep digesting your turkey. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_8U4j51lI New version of pie should get dropped next week. -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release 2013-12-02 1:07 [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release Dave Taht @ 2013-12-02 10:44 ` Sebastian Moeller 2013-12-02 15:17 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Moeller @ 2013-12-02 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: cerowrt-devel Hi Dave, On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for > dnsmasq. It is completely untested. > > + fresh merge with openwrt > ++ bunch of ath9k fixes > + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs) > > - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436 > plan to update the machine involved to this version. > hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someone > with comcast ipv6 to try this on.... > > - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried it > will do so shortly The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in its already installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the upgrade. I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try the next time :) BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place, or what is the busy box mount command missing? best regards sebastian > > - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack > in openwrt in general, but no details. > > I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work > on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through > their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now > and thursday. > > In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep > digesting your turkey. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_8U4j51lI > > New version of pie should get dropped next week. > > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release 2013-12-02 10:44 ` Sebastian Moeller @ 2013-12-02 15:17 ` Dave Taht 2013-12-02 15:46 ` David Personette 2013-12-08 17:13 ` Sebastian Moeller 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2013-12-02 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sebastian Moeller; +Cc: cerowrt-devel As best as I recall it was needed for ext4 and btrfs support on mounting external devices, but that was years ago. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > > On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for >> dnsmasq. It is completely untested. >> >> + fresh merge with openwrt >> ++ bunch of ath9k fixes >> + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs) >> >> - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436 >> plan to update the machine involved to this version. >> hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someone >> with comcast ipv6 to try this on.... >> >> - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried it >> will do so shortly > > The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in its already installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the upgrade. I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try the next time :) > BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place, or what is the busy box mount command missing? > > best regards > sebastian > >> >> - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack >> in openwrt in general, but no details. >> >> I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work >> on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through >> their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now >> and thursday. >> >> In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep >> digesting your turkey. >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_8U4j51lI >> >> New version of pie should get dropped next week. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release 2013-12-02 15:17 ` Dave Taht @ 2013-12-02 15:46 ` David Personette 2013-12-08 17:13 ` Sebastian Moeller 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: David Personette @ 2013-12-02 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: cerowrt-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2976 bytes --] It's been running fine for me this morning. I didn't experience the odhcp6d issue personally (21 day uptime on 3.10.18-1). Thanks. -- David P. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > As best as I recall it was needed for ext4 and btrfs support on > mounting external devices, but that was years ago. > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for > >> dnsmasq. It is completely untested. > >> > >> + fresh merge with openwrt > >> ++ bunch of ath9k fixes > >> + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs) > >> > >> - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436 > >> plan to update the machine involved to this version. > >> hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someone > >> with comcast ipv6 to try this on.... > >> > >> - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried it > >> will do so shortly > > > > The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before > running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the > incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in its > already installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the upgrade. > I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try the next > time :) > > BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place, > or what is the busy box mount command missing? > > > > best regards > > sebastian > > > >> > >> - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack > >> in openwrt in general, but no details. > >> > >> I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work > >> on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through > >> their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now > >> and thursday. > >> > >> In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep > >> digesting your turkey. > >> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_8U4j51lI > >> > >> New version of pie should get dropped next week. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dave Täht > >> > >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list > >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4477 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release 2013-12-02 15:17 ` Dave Taht 2013-12-02 15:46 ` David Personette @ 2013-12-08 17:13 ` Sebastian Moeller 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Moeller @ 2013-12-08 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: cerowrt-devel Hi Dave, On Dec 2, 2013, at 16:17 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > As best as I recall it was needed for ext4 and btrfs support on > mounting external devices, but that was years ago. Thanks for the information; so I used this a starting point and I have the impression that now a days the mount-utils are needed for mount by label and mount by UUID. And if I understand correctly the new block-mount and ubox opkgs already allow mount-by-UUID without mount-utils. So even though I am currently mount by label, maybe mount-util can be relegated to an optional install in cerowrt, hoping that might solve the sysupgrade challenges. best Sebastian > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> >> On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for >>> dnsmasq. It is completely untested. >>> >>> + fresh merge with openwrt >>> ++ bunch of ath9k fixes >>> + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs) >>> >>> - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436 >>> plan to update the machine involved to this version. >>> hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someone >>> with comcast ipv6 to try this on.... >>> >>> - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried it >>> will do so shortly >> >> The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in its already installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the upgrade. I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try the next time :) >> BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place, or what is the busy box mount command missing? >> >> best regards >> sebastian >> >>> >>> - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack >>> in openwrt in general, but no details. >>> >>> I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work >>> on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through >>> their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now >>> and thursday. >>> >>> In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep >>> digesting your turkey. >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_8U4j51lI >>> >>> New version of pie should get dropped next week. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Täht >>> >>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-08 17:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-12-02 1:07 [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release Dave Taht 2013-12-02 10:44 ` Sebastian Moeller 2013-12-02 15:17 ` Dave Taht 2013-12-02 15:46 ` David Personette 2013-12-08 17:13 ` Sebastian Moeller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox