From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6372021A8 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail210-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.239) by CO1EHSOBE012.bigfish.com (10.243.66.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:28:24 +0000 Received: from mail210-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail210-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD47C30018D for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:28:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.244.213; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:CH1PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: VPS-4(zz98dI103dKzz1202hzz8275chz31h2a8h668h839h944hd25he5bhf0ah107ah) Received-SPF: softfail (mail210-co1: transitioning domain of dartware.com does not designate 157.56.244.213 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.244.213; envelope-from=richard.e.brown@dartware.com; helo=CH1PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook Received: from mail210-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail210-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1343330902930286_4747; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.228]) by mail210-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B89380044 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.244.213) by CO1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (10.243.66.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:28:23 +0000 Received: from CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.11.220]) by CH1PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.150.36]) with mapi id 14.16.0175.005; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:28:16 +0000 From: Richard Brown To: "" Thread-Topic: Report of using HE IPv6 tunnel Thread-Index: AQHNa2TNmhuPbYcwLkGcp8KpPXDlfQ== Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:28:15 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.150.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <095E6FF92AA6B74E984788B5B8449108@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: dartware.com Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Report of using HE IPv6 tunnel X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:28:26 -0000 --- Dave Taht wrote: > 3.3.8-10 and -11 were not as good as I'd hoped. --- end of quote --- One thing I noticed was that the Tunnelbroker.net script on the wiki (http:= //www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/IPv6_Tunnel) did not work for 3= .3.8-10 and -11. (3.3.8-6 works fine!) I'm happy to test any build you produce. Thanks! Rich Brown Hanover, NH USA=