From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5608B21F1E1 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from u-089-csam313b.am5.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.89.14]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Md3li-1VQYoV1nMo-00I9Zf for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:26:41 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:26:41 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <0CA86B40-F485-4164-B183-E0A53D800FC8@imap.cc> To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:VJtTJIpeMvUr0Gw6QsdKrLdvASPWgrGqYf5dtmU49wkRrgwqWw1 cGCJ7DimcPuYbdhV8tPlPVeEY/mHT7FzIvJpkI2TBGsW+qttY9cXXkFunLRHUSFbSJKsO3p 6P9Go9J/bhwY6JrQr8QPrXkbarqqqEdW4CixmSctrU0LhqDopvSj/urU2RqQiH31aNjNfTG lwfZSFU0Nko2irrygN2GA== Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] AQM and ADSL X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:26:45 -0000 Hi Dave, On Aug 13, 2013, at 22:33 , Dave Taht wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Fred Stratton = wrote: >=20 >>>=20 >>> DT has taken to stealth with his releases. >=20 > Heh. No, these are not releases. If I don't get a chance to do some > testing I don't post their existence to the list. >=20 > I don't mind people being eager and willing to test 'em without me > doing so, tho. >=20 > To explain, I do what's called "continuous integration" whenever > possible (see wikipedia) Ah, understood, I guess continuous testing works well with this = approach :) >=20 > Big triggers for that are new kernel releases (like 3.10.6), fixes > like the boatload that felix just landed for the ethernet and the wifi > aggregation rework, and tossing in a new version of the codel patches, > and tossing in the AQM stuff that sebastian just did - and all that > landed in 3.10.6-1. >=20 > Merely getting this stuff to compile is often a chore. In fact, it > took me all day to get all that to work... and my only spare router I > dare sacrifice (the other 4 in the testbed are doing some benchmarks > as I write) is still in my suitcase and in the car. >=20 > Usually I get around to announcing a "development release" once it's > been tested for a little while, at least a quick check, and preferably > a couple hours under heavy load, and usually that will be at least a > -3. I generally try to stay away from X.Y.0 and wait for X.Y.1... >=20 > We still have a few things left to fold into this kernel - notably the > new htb patches from jesper and to backport a few other fixes from > net-next, and it looks like the changes to the AQM thing need a > smarter radio box in the gui(?). Ah, yes, I was looking for radio buttons initially came up = blank, then failed to get LUCI's :depends mechanism work properly and = just resorted to exposing both checkboxes. Far from ideal, I guess in = the next iteration I will just have a drop down bow with "none", "htb", = "stab" then it will be unambiguous. > I'm also trying to freeze the ubnt > picostation and nanostation on the same stuff (and what's causing even > more delay is trying to get a guruplug and edgerouter booted with it > too. I've always resisted expanding the scope of the cerowrt project > to more hardware, but I need two higher power boxes to drive some > tests with desperately) More hardware, more pain? I wonder, have you found a successor = to the WNDR3[7|8]00 yet? >=20 > I'm off to do my laundry in a bit, and will return with fresh clothes > and that router this evening. >=20 > I would very much like to get to a new "stable" release this month, > it's been far too long since the last one! But to do that we have to > have zero crash bugs Okay, not that it is conclusive, but 3.10.1-1did not crash on me = once. > , and be "feature complete". I think we are close > to zero crashes (but felix fiddling with the ethernet and the wifi > recently scares me and I still haven't checked to see if sysupgrade > worked in a couple releases (I flash via tftp usually)), but there are > some nagging features that I'd like to get in there. So are Felix changes already in 3.10.6? If so I will ahead and = try to sysupgrade it (I always can fall back to TFTP even if it is a bit = inconvenient due to positioning the router above my reach :) ) > Like this one. > Keep plugging away, please. >=20 > Are there any other must-have features for this puppy? I've been > looking over gargoyle's ACC code in particular. Many Thanks & Best Regards Sebastian >=20 >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> So 3.10.6-1 fails with sysupgrade? >>>>=20 >>>> best >>>> Sebastian >>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >>>>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=E4ht >=20 > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: = http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel