From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailhost.cotse.com (mail.cotse.net [66.203.85.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B00AE21F55A for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:30:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from out.packetderm.com (out.packetderm.com [66.203.85.62]) by mailhost.cotse.com (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBC1UGTs087655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:30:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cerowrt@decoy.cotse.net) Received: from localhost (localhost[127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp (5.7.4/5.7.4) with ESMTP id sBC1UG0A005367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:30:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cerowrt@decoy.cotse.net) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:30:15 -0500 From: Joseph Swick MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] how is everyone's uptime? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:30:47 -0000 On 12/10/2014 05:52 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > the lab where I was keeping a box up under load had a long enough > power failure last week to keeelll my approximatively 76 days uptime. > > Anybody else got any record-holders here? > > I am interested in long term memory leakage (run a free), > process usage (runaways like pimd), and growth in disk space usage (df), > so output like > > uptime > free > df > > periodically would be nice. > (Hopefully this gets through) Here's mine: root@gw:~# uptime 01:10:07 up 117 days, 1:43, load average: 0.26, 0.17, 0.12 root@gw:~# free total used free shared buffers Mem: 126256 55744 70512 0 6240 -/+ buffers: 49504 76752 Swap: 0 0 0 root@gw:~# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on rootfs 7296 404 6892 6% / /dev/root 7680 7680 0 100% /rom tmpfs 63128 1272 61856 2% /tmp /dev/mtdblock5 7296 404 6892 6% /overlay overlayfs:/overlay 7296 404 6892 6% / tmpfs However, while I'm getting an IPv6 address from Comcast, I don't have IPv6 working inside, and I see this regularly in my logs: Fri Dec 12 01:23:53 2014 daemon.warn odhcpd[1289]: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on sw00 thus we don't announce a default route! Fri Dec 12 01:23:54 2014 daemon.warn odhcpd[1289]: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on se00 thus we don't announce a default route! Fri Dec 12 01:23:58 2014 daemon.warn odhcpd[1289]: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on sw00 thus we don't announce a default route! Fri Dec 12 01:23:59 2014 daemon.warn odhcpd[1289]: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on se00 thus we don't announce a default route! Fri Dec 12 01:24:02 2014 daemon.warn odhcpd[1289]: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on sw00 thus we don't announce a default route! I had tried to send a message to the list about it a while back, but I think it may have gone to the bit-bucket due to how I setup my email aliases (hoping the same fate doesn't happen to this message). At the time I thought it may have been PLEBKAC (mine), but I think there's been a few others who have posted similar error messages. I just haven't had a whole lot of time to try to investigate myself, so I've just been continuing to live with just IPv4. -- Joseph Swick