From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D20C621F0F2 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:15:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id qBNGFUJ8001460; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:15:30 -0800 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:14:53 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42A2907F@CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Richard Brown , "" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR3700v4 is out... X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:15:34 -0000 In looking at their products, they seem to have almost nothing that's dual band, am I missing something? David Lang On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Dave Taht wrote: > I wouldn't mind adding explicit support for ubiquity's in-home product > to cerowrt.