From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy?
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:05:21 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312191204490.26048@nftneq.ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zjnxxk3u.fsf@toke.dk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 743 bytes --]
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> David Lang <david@lang.hm> writes:
>
>> I believe that Linux allows having both tagged and untagged packets on
>> the samy physical interface, so the APs could communicate on a VLAN
>> and one could be the gateway to the rest of the network (similar type
>> of overhead in this case to GRE tunnels in that all traffic would get
>> routed through one system, but I think it would still be less)
>
> What happens to the VLAN tags if the traffic goes through a
> non-VLAN-aware switch?
non-aware switches will just pass the packets, reatining the tagging
> Also, presumably you would need one VLAN/tunnel for each wireless
> network (so four in the default cerowrt setup)?
Yes.
David Lang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-16 19:46 Dave Taht
2013-12-16 20:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-12-16 20:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-12-16 20:48 ` Kelvin Edmison
2013-12-16 21:28 ` David Lang
2013-12-16 22:06 ` Fred Stratton
2013-12-17 17:54 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-17 18:51 ` Jim Gettys
2013-12-17 22:25 ` dpreed
2013-12-17 22:32 ` Jim Gettys
2013-12-17 23:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-12-18 1:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-18 3:04 ` David Lang
2013-12-18 5:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-18 5:49 ` David Lang
2013-12-18 14:17 ` Chuck Anderson
2013-12-18 15:19 ` dpreed
2013-12-18 16:54 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-18 18:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-12-18 19:24 ` David Lang
2013-12-18 20:07 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-18 20:14 ` David Lang
2013-12-19 9:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-12-19 14:32 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-19 20:05 ` David Lang [this message]
2013-12-19 21:01 ` Chuck Anderson
2013-12-20 0:50 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-20 5:18 ` dpreed
2013-12-18 14:06 ` Michael Richardson
2013-12-27 23:56 ` Maciej Soltysiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1312191204490.26048@nftneq.ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox