From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0700721F2B5 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:41:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s23JfUoN026920; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:41:35 -0800 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:41:30 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: "J. Daniel Ashton" In-Reply-To: <530A4791.8080903@ashtonfam.org> Message-ID: References: <20140223172140.GB24483@lists.bufferbloat.net> <530A4791.8080903@ashtonfam.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/Mixed; BOUNDARY="===============4692615138479952263==" Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] saner defaults for config/firewall X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:41:58 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --===============4692615138479952263== Content-Type: TEXT/Plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, J. Daniel Ashton wrote: > 2. Google's new Chromecast device useable from all non-guest segments: > it has no Ethernet port, so it is on Wi-Fi at 2Mhz, my table on > Wi-Fi at 5Mhz, and my desktop on Ethernet. Both tablet and desktop > should be able to see the Chromecast and control it. There is a pretty basic problem with Chromecast in that the app to configure it looks at what network the android device is on and tries to have the Chromecast connect to that same network. If you have different SSIDs for 2.4 and 5GHz and are connected to 5GHz the result is failure, even if the networks are bridged together (let alone routed) I'll have to go back and test again, but I think I still had problems even after the initial configuration if I connected to it via the wrong network. David Lang --===============4692615138479952263== Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: INLINE _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --===============4692615138479952263==--