From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25C8B21F22F for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:59:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s4LHwvx2007031; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:58:57 -0700 Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:58:57 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <006001cf7478$804951e0$80dbf5a0$@riepnet.com> <006b01cf74e9$c9edf190$5dc9d4b0$@com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Frits Riep , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Ideas on how to simplify and popularize bufferbloat control for consideration. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 17:59:00 -0000 On Wed, 21 May 2014, Dave Taht wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Frits Riep wrote: >> Thanks Dave for your responses. Based on this, it is very good that >> qos-scripts is available now through openwrt, and as I experienced, it >> provides a huge advantage for most users. > > I should point out that another issue with deploying fq_codel widely is that > it requires an accurate measurement (currently) of the providers bandwidth. does it need this accurate measurement for sending or for the recieving pacing? David Lang