From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: dpreed@reed.com
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Ubiquiti QOS
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 16:11:21 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405261604541.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401112879.32226492@apps.rackspace.com>
On Mon, 26 May 2014, dpreed@reed.com wrote:
> I would look to queue minimization rather than "queue management" (which
> implied queues are often long) as a goal, and think harder about the
> end-to-end problem of minimizing total end-to-end queueing delay while
> maximizing throughput.
As far as I can tell, this is exactly what CODEL and PIE tries to do. They
try to find a decent tradeoff between having queues to make sure the pipe
is filled, and not making these queues big enough to seriously affect
interactive performance.
The latter part looks like what LEDBAT does?
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6817>
Or are you thinking about something else?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-26 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-25 6:17 Dane Medic
2014-05-25 14:23 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-05-25 15:42 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-05-25 20:00 ` dpreed
2014-05-26 0:18 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-05-26 4:49 ` dpreed
2014-05-26 13:02 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-05-26 14:01 ` dpreed
2014-05-26 14:11 ` Mikael Abrahamsson [this message]
2014-05-26 15:31 ` David P. Reed
2014-05-27 21:19 ` David Lang
2014-05-27 22:00 ` Dave Taht
2014-05-27 23:27 ` David Lang
2014-05-28 2:12 ` Dave Taht
2014-05-28 3:21 ` David Lang
2014-05-28 15:52 ` dpreed
2014-05-28 16:34 ` David Lang
2014-05-27 15:23 ` Jim Gettys
2014-05-27 17:31 ` Dave Taht
2014-05-28 15:33 ` dpreed
2014-05-28 15:20 ` dpreed
2014-05-28 18:33 ` David Lang
2014-05-29 12:11 ` David P. Reed
2014-05-29 15:29 ` dpreed
2014-05-29 19:30 ` David Lang
2014-05-29 23:40 ` Michael Richardson
2014-05-30 0:32 ` David P. Reed
2014-05-30 0:36 ` Dave Taht
2014-05-25 18:39 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-05-25 19:33 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1405261604541.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se \
--to=swmike@swm.pp.se \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dpreed@reed.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox