From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F3E921F44E for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s6INP2BT028085; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:25:02 -0700 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:25:02 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] I've always liked the idea of doing up building-wide networks X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 23:25:04 -0000 On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Dave Taht wrote: > ... In particular when it came to getting minimal interference on all > the wifi access points. It is better to have fewer, better wifi APs > with a co-ordinated channel allocation strategy in an apartment > building than everybody installing one willy-nilly. the key is the co-ordinated channel allocation, beyond that it can be better to have more, "worse" wifi APs than fewer "better" ones to reduce interference. > http://www.frankston.com/public/?name=20140717-0146 looks interesting > BTW: When I find an interesting link, these days, I tend to just put > it on my g+ rather than the email lists, and tend to feel I'm wasting > other people's bandwidth by doing it on the list - although sometimes > a good discussion is sparked. Should I stop forwarding stuff like this > (and the mit paper) to the list? to the list, even if it's a link I don't care about, it's easier to delete it along with other e-mail than to go to G+ and look at it. Also, remember that people's G+ feeds show a sampling of what other people post, so some people will miss it if you only post it to G+ David Lang