From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Upper routing throughput limit
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:06:02 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1408061603491.12760@nftneq.ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E2839D.8090304@gmail.com>
When link speeds get high enough, do we still need to shape the download for
home users? at some point you stop saturating the line.
the 3800 can easily handle 100mb if it's not trying to shape the traffic, is it
worth seeing if there's any way to squeeze that shaping overhead down?
David Lang
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, William Katsak wrote:
> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 15:35:57 -0400
> From: William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com>
> To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
> <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Upper routing throughput limit
>
> Sorry to wake this thread up again. It does indeed seem that the 3800 is
> having trouble routing at my line speed.
>
> I was considering doing a pfSense box, but it doesn't seem that Bufferbloat
> has been much of a consideration yet over there. There is a version of Codel,
> but the QoS would have to be set up manually.
>
> I've Googled this Ubiquiti Edgerouter Lite, and I am intrigued. I don't see
> many details on Ubiquiti's site about the QoS though. Is this device as good
> at beating bloat as Cero? Would mating one of these with a 3800 (for Wifi
> only) be a good bet?
>
> Thanks,
> -Bill
>
>
> On 07/10/2014 11:01 AM, Aaron Wood wrote:
>> It depends on the aqm rules that are configured. In the base setup, it
>> struggles at 50Mbps. But that can be increased by switching from the
>> simple.qos script to simplest.qos (I'm not sure where the limit is with
>> the simplest.qos script.
>>
>> I know that Dave Taht has been working with some other platforms. The
>> Ubiquity EdgeRouter Lite may be able to hit 100Mbps, but it doesn't run
>> CeroWRT itself, it just supports similar configuration.
>>
>> -Aaron
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:49 AM, William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com
>> <mailto:wkatsak@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does anyone have a good sense of the most throughput our 3800s with
>> Cero can push through the WAN interface? Are we good to 100 mbps?
>> 1gbps?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bill Katsak
>> _________________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.__bufferbloat.net
>> <mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/__listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-06 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-10 14:49 William Katsak
2014-07-10 15:01 ` Aaron Wood
2014-07-10 15:19 ` William Katsak
2014-07-11 9:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
[not found] ` <3FF07025-9AE2-4A6F-9E7B-A0AC5CAFD290@gmail.com>
2014-08-09 18:52 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-08-06 19:35 ` William Katsak
2014-08-06 23:06 ` David Lang [this message]
2014-08-06 23:10 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1408061603491.12760@nftneq.ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=wkatsak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox