From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24C3C21F2F5
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue,  9 Sep 2014 23:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id EF6C0A3; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 08:43:41 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
	t=1410331421; bh=iY9vneruaFp7SOKDbHe1VoeXHxWQB6NzpxB6Zeq6Pqo=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=CIlLvXI72+EfHk/mjghVN5QUtvTvl/O9RrkYSCFIeT5yxVtFbuwrYGlRYwwnXUiVC
	6SHXq7OTNo/D9exYkO9T4pHvJ+enY0LlkpTu3UZLceUP6h6Nzn+/OK/3NWkxF5deXI
	0BrG0leOZOBG8cbvDlwcsdjmgLnT96o11YCa3iK8=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6475A2;
	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 08:43:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 08:43:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Joel_Wir=C4=81mu_Pauling?= <joel@aenertia.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKiAkGR9S8bLxovyvXoYc9seqv69bMbpAsakJyEwU5Xy4Q70dg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1409100842350.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAA93jw5ezd4BqQK+Uv+P0q9gCBYPqvsQdoWnQfJYi5tnw=Ar-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<lulgfc$ikn$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<CAKiAkGR9S8bLxovyvXoYc9seqv69bMbpAsakJyEwU5Xy4Q70dg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED;
	BOUNDARY="-137064504-1919961090-1410331421=:14735"
Cc: Wes Felter <wmf@felter.org>, "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 10GigE nics and SFP+ modules?
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:44:14 -0000

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

---137064504-1919961090-1410331421=:14735
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:

> Just a head's up I have had issues with the X5xx intel SFP+ optics
> interoperating with other vendors. This may not be an issue for your
> deployment.

As far as I know, you also have to make sure to buy intel optics to put in 
intel NICs. This vendor lock-in is something we (as customers) have been 
able to beat out of Cisco, Juniper and the lot, but it seems Intel is 
still able to get their customer base to accept this.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
---137064504-1919961090-1410331421=:14735--